Prev: ETHERISTS LESS INSANE THAN EINSTEINIANS
Next: (only $20-$38,free shipping) for newest Nike air max --Paypal
From: harald on 18 May 2010 17:07 On May 18, 7:13 am, nobody1357 <nobody1...(a)operamail.com> wrote: > Hi, please consider this setup > > A B > ______________ > > ______ is the lab frame, A and B are identical cars > carrying same amount of fuel. > > They start their engines at the same time and accelerate in > the same direction until they run out the fuel. > > Now, according to the lab frame, the distance between A and B has not > changed, it's same as when they started, since there is no > reason for identical cars would have moved differently. > > Now, If A and B were connected, they would have lorentz contracted as > a system, but since they are not connected, according to them, the > distance must have increased (as opposed to the contracted > state which their distance would seem the same to them). > > So far so good... Yes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell%27s_spaceship_paradox > However, suppose A sends a light pulse to B, which > gets reflected back to A, and A measures the duration of this. Since > their clocks are slowed down, A must now find that this duration has > decreased, compared to the beginning of the experiment, and > therefore concludes their distance have decreased. No. Probably you mixed up reference frames. In the lab frame they are measured to be moving, with slowed down clocks - that includes light clocks! The typical "according to them", is just such a measurement with light! Remember Michelson-Morley*: by means of light, they would only measure in the moving frame that the distance remained the *same*, if in the stationary frame the distance along the line of motion was measured to be *contracted*. As that did not happen, they will measure that the distance has increased. * If you don't know the essential details of MMX, see: - bottom of http://www.bartleby.com/173/16.html - http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/On_the_Relative_Motion_of_the_Earth_and_the_Luminiferous_Ether > So there is the paradox, was the distance increased or > decreased according to A? > Thanks for your help in advance. Increased. Regards, Harald
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: ETHERISTS LESS INSANE THAN EINSTEINIANS Next: (only $20-$38,free shipping) for newest Nike air max --Paypal |