From: Gina Whipp on 16 Mar 2010 10:37 Fred, No worries... no one thinks you plagiarized anyone... Steve is just *trying* to gain some credibility. I will leave it at that. -- Gina Whipp 2010 Microsoft MVP (Access) "I feel I have been denied critical, need to know, information!" - Tremors II http://www.regina-whipp.com/index_files/TipList.htm "Fred" <Fred(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:912F773A-2DA3-4A6A-B718-62736D68DC79(a)microsoft.com... Checking the Microsoft site directly: Steve's post: 3/12/2010 1:30 PM PST My Post 3/12/2010 1:31 PM PST Checking common sense, there's only on answer to the poster's guestion, and a very simple obvious one at that, which is the simplest and most common relationship structure. one-to-many staff and drills (performed) table. I think that Steve thinks he invented it. Good thing I didn't mention a look up table for the drill types, or he would claim that he invented lookup tables that day and that I plagiarized the concept of lookup tables from him. Checking reality, it was obvious that I wrote it without having seen his, doubly obvious from the time stamps directly on the Microsoft site.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: How do I setup a date field property that allows only Saturdays? Next: Items table help |