From: Baron on
Jeff Strickland Inscribed thus:

> Win7 is _always_ going to be 64-bit, is that right?
>
> There is no reason to say, Win7 (64-bit) because Win7 is never
> anything but 64-bit, so it's redundant.

Your running a netbook so your win 7 is likely to be 32 bit.

Just do a full restore and save yourself the pain.

--
Best Regards:
Baron.
From: Jeff Strickland on

"Baron" <baron.nospam(a)linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:hk29pd$1r2$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> Jeff Strickland Inscribed thus:
>
>> Win7 is _always_ going to be 64-bit, is that right?
>>
>> There is no reason to say, Win7 (64-bit) because Win7 is never
>> anything but 64-bit, so it's redundant.
>
> Your running a netbook so your win 7 is likely to be 32 bit.
>
> Just do a full restore and save yourself the pain.
>


It absolutely is 64-bit. But that's not the question. The question is, is
Win7 in both 32- and 64-bit?

I have two friends that bought Vista 64-bit systems that came with a free
upgrade to Win7. the upgrade was not available to Vista 32-bit systems being
sold at the same time. This makes me believe that Win7 is always going to be
64-bit.








From: Baron on
Jeff Strickland Inscribed thus:

>
> "Baron" <baron.nospam(a)linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:hk29pd$1r2$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>> Jeff Strickland Inscribed thus:
>>
>>> Win7 is _always_ going to be 64-bit, is that right?
>>>
>>> There is no reason to say, Win7 (64-bit) because Win7 is never
>>> anything but 64-bit, so it's redundant.
>>
>> Your running a netbook so your win 7 is likely to be 32 bit.
>>
>> Just do a full restore and save yourself the pain.
>>
>
>
> It absolutely is 64-bit. But that's not the question. The question is,
> is Win7 in both 32- and 64-bit?

Yes !

> I have two friends that bought Vista 64-bit systems that came with a
> free upgrade to Win7. the upgrade was not available to Vista 32-bit
> systems being sold at the same time. This makes me believe that Win7
> is always going to be 64-bit.

That is simply to push 64 bit and create a requirement for more
resources. In turn creating more hardware sales.

--
Best Regards:
Baron.
From: James D. Andrews on

"Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hk4e72$ld5$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> Sorry if I did not make it clear earlier, I did Uninstall first. McAfee
> does not get fully removed from the Registry just because you Uninstall
> it. This is why I characterize it as a virus that protects yo from the
> other virii.
>
> It's sort of like the Taliban keeping out the bad guys.
>
>

Great analogy.



--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: Jeff Strickland on

"Robert Baer" <robertbaer(a)localnet.com> wrote in message
news:nKydnQSZA7IIMPvWnZ2dnUVZ_gJi4p2d(a)posted.localnet...
>>
> With one exception, there are NO programs i know of that fully
> uninstall..and it seems from your description that McAfee is worse than
> most.
> In any event, wipe the HD and install what you WANT from scratch (and no
> more than that).



Right answer.

I reloaded Win7, then Uninstalled McAfee -- the installer that comes with
the machine has McAfee built in, and I cannot deselect it -- then called my
ISP's tech support line and found that their stuff has merged with McAfee
(or otherwise joined forces). In any case, the problem isn't exactly what I
thought it was. It's just as bad, but not what I thought. One of the things
that my ISP offers is something called Family Protection, and it protects
the family by not working right. They connected me with a guy in India that
had me uninstall the Family Protection, and my machine works right with the
ISS running.

Now I have to re-evaluate my situatin with my ISP relative to the ISS they
offer.






 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Laptop, wifi & security?
Next: XP System Restore