From: CANews on
Hi
I am looking setting up failover cluster for our IIS7 web sites. These
sites rely on host headers. An associate doesnt think windows failover
cluster services will handle the host headers ? Would that be an issue and
is there a good MS reference on such
Many regards

Touie


From: Chris M on
On 06/05/2010 23:22, CANews wrote:
> Hi
> I am looking setting up failover cluster for our IIS7 web sites. These
> sites rely on host headers. An associate doesnt think windows failover
> cluster services will handle the host headers ? Would that be an issue and
> is there a good MS reference on such
> Many regards

IIS lends itself better to load balancing than failover. Is there a
reason why you can't use that?

--
Chris M.
From: CANews on
Well No, as long as it provides total failover.

"Chris M" <nobody(a)nowhere.special> wrote in message
news:hrvlt6$a1a$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
> On 06/05/2010 23:22, CANews wrote:
>> Hi
>> I am looking setting up failover cluster for our IIS7 web sites. These
>> sites rely on host headers. An associate doesnt think windows failover
>> cluster services will handle the host headers ? Would that be an issue
>> and
>> is there a good MS reference on such
>> Many regards
>
> IIS lends itself better to load balancing than failover. Is there a reason
> why you can't use that?
>
> --
> Chris M.


From: Chris M on
On 07/05/2010 02:15, CANews wrote:
> Well No, as long as it provides total failover.

It's not exactly the same as failover, but it will give you the same
benefit in the event that a server fails. It's also easier to scale out
in the event that your site becomes more busy - just add more web
servers into the cluster and ensure that you have sufficient to manage
the load if one fails (i.e. N+1 redundancy).

--
Chris M.

> "Chris M"<nobody(a)nowhere.special> wrote in message
> news:hrvlt6$a1a$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>> On 06/05/2010 23:22, CANews wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> I am looking setting up failover cluster for our IIS7 web sites. These
>>> sites rely on host headers. An associate doesnt think windows failover
>>> cluster services will handle the host headers ? Would that be an issue
>>> and
>>> is there a good MS reference on such
>>> Many regards
>>
>> IIS lends itself better to load balancing than failover. Is there a reason
>> why you can't use that?
>>
>> --
>> Chris M.
>
>