From: David Miller on 6 Apr 2010 14:00 From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra(a)chello.nl> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:28:07 +0200 > This patch set tries to solve the local_irq_disable() vs NMI problem > that SPARC has by providing new arch hooks and instrumenting the > existing interface to WARN on conflicting usage. Thanks Peter, looks good at first sight. I'll toss together the sparc bits and give this a go. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: David Miller on 6 Apr 2010 19:50 From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra(a)chello.nl> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:28:07 +0200 > This patch set tries to solve the local_irq_disable() vs NMI problem > that SPARC has by providing new arch hooks and instrumenting the > existing interface to WARN on conflicting usage. Ok, two patches coming. One which adds the sparc64 irqflags.h methods. And one which annotates the ftrace functions, as needed. With this I have the function tracer working. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: [PATCH 6/6] i2c: davinci: bus recovery procedure to clear the bus Next: (none) |