From: Kabuki on 29 Dec 2009 14:57 "John Stafford" <nhoj(a)droffats.net> wrote in message news:nhoj-B26130.11192329122009(a)news.supernews.com... > > One more difference between PC and Mac for PS, and it has to do with the > OS - In Windows/PC you can open an image using a url. Not so on the Mac. > > Try it in Photoshop Windows. In the open dialog, type: > http://www.digoliardi.net/tmp.jpg > > No big deal. > > One can also use the command line in Windows/PC to execute a droplet > with arguments (the file path,filename), although I don't do that > anymore. That works in the system dialog----YES!! (not the Adobe dialog) never knew that b4 ---------thanks --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: krp on 30 Dec 2009 06:03 "Andr�, PE1PQX" <Andre_geenviagra(a)pe1pqx.eu> wrote in message news:7pultpFcj4U1(a)mid.individual.net... > krp drukte met precisie uit : >> "Andr�, PE1PQX" <Andre_geenviagra(a)pe1pqx.eu> wrote in message >> news:7pujmmFvr1U1(a)mid.individual.net... >>> Op 29-12-2009, heeft krp verondersteld : >>>> "Andr�, PE1PQX" <Andre_geenviagra(a)pe1pqx.eu> wrote in message >>>> news:7ps7daFnlmU1(a)mid.individual.net... >>>>> Het is z� dat krp formuleerde : >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> BULLSHIT!!! >>>> >>>> WHATEVER! >>> >>> With a decent PC (windows based) photoshop can and will run smoothly. >>> I have no MAC's here, and photoshop runs fine with no issue. >>> So 'GET A MAC' is utter BS! >> >> Have you ever worked with PS on a MAC? Have you ever looked at the >> graphics business? MOST (like 90%) use MACS and the MACS can do things >> better AND don't fail anywhere near as often as CS 4 does on a PC. I am >> using a PC. I sometimes work with folks that have MACS. They have 1% of >> the headaches that I do, especially in converting formats. > > What a MAC can do, a PC can do to... And do HALF ASSED.
From: André, PE1PQX on 30 Dec 2009 06:30 krp heeft ons zojuist aangekondigd : > "Andr�, PE1PQX" <Andre_geenviagra(a)pe1pqx.eu> wrote in message > news:7pultpFcj4U1(a)mid.individual.net... >> krp drukte met precisie uit : >>> "Andr�, PE1PQX" <Andre_geenviagra(a)pe1pqx.eu> wrote in message >>> news:7pujmmFvr1U1(a)mid.individual.net... >>>> Op 29-12-2009, heeft krp verondersteld : >>>>> >>>> >>>> With a decent PC (windows based) photoshop can and will run smoothly. >>>> I have no MAC's here, and photoshop runs fine with no issue. >>>> So 'GET A MAC' is utter BS! >>> >>> Have you ever worked with PS on a MAC? Have you ever looked at the >>> graphics business? MOST (like 90%) use MACS and the MACS can do things >>> better AND don't fail anywhere near as often as CS 4 does on a PC. I am >>> using a PC. I sometimes work with folks that have MACS. They have 1% of >>> the headaches that I do, especially in converting formats. >> >> What a MAC can do, a PC can do to... > > And do HALF ASSED. Ow, please SHUT UP!! The time MAC were better for DPT is long gone!
From: Mike Russell on 30 Dec 2009 07:25 On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:30:44 +0100, Andr�, PE1PQX wrote: > The time MAC were better for DPT is long gone! But not the time for arguing about it, apparently. Platform wars are like monkeys standing on elephants, throwing coconuts at each other. -- Mike Russell - http://www.curvemeister.com
From: krp on 30 Dec 2009 11:06
"Mike Russell" <groupsRE(a)MOVEcurvemeister.com> wrote in message news:17ekoxg9wxyil.dlg(a)mike.curvemeister.com... > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:30:44 +0100, Andr�, PE1PQX wrote: > >> The time MAC were better for DPT is long gone! Oh yes - VISTA is such a GREAT SUCCESS! |