If no neutral charge, all forces can be explained
in [Physics]
|
Prev: No neutral charge
Next: some backtracking in deriving speed of light from purely math considerations ; speed of light Chapt 19 #194; ATOM TOTALITY
From: guskz on 23 Jun 2010 14:01 If as in the prior post, the electron & proton do not truly form a neutral charge that the answer for ALL the forces can be EASILY explained, and the foundation for the Unified Field Theory. The best simple model is two identical atoms with a single proton nucleus and single electron orbital to determine all the forces. Obviously the strongest force would be the primary, the lesser forces it's derivative. The electrical force #1. The magnetic force the math from the torque moment caused by the electron's orbital with the opposite atoms nucleus. Gravity by the sum of all repulsive forces with all the attractive forces between both atoms. Where as the nucleus positive force is always constant, and the negative forces momentary (excluding torque) in relation to both their orbitals and wave like periods. 2010: Before Einstein and Earthquakes, GUSKZ.
From: guskz on 23 Jun 2010 14:09 On Jun 23, 2:01 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > If as in the prior post, the electron & proton do not truly form a > neutral charge that the answer for ALL then the answer.... >the forces can be EASILY > explained, and the foundation for the Unified Field Theory. > > The best simple model is two identical atoms with a single proton > nucleus and single electron orbital to determine all the forces. > > Obviously the strongest force would be the primary, the lesser forces > it's derivative. > > The electrical force #1. > The magnetic force the math from the torque moment caused by the > electron's orbital with the opposite atoms nucleus. > Gravity by the sum of all repulsive forces with all the attractive > forces between both atoms. Where as the nucleus positive force is > always constant, and the negative forces always constant because the protons are concentrated in the tiny nucleus (perhaps still wave like but more than likely a perfectly straight horizontal line representing the electric force of the protons....) where as the electron is spread along it's bigger orbital. >momentary (excluding torque) > in relation to both their orbitals and wave like periods. > > 2010: Before Einstein and Earthquakes, GUSKZ.
From: BURT on 23 Jun 2010 14:18 On Jun 23, 11:09 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 23, 2:01 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > If as in the prior post, the electron & proton do not truly form a > > neutral charge that the answer for ALL > > then the answer.... > > >the forces can be EASILY > > explained, and the foundation for the Unified Field Theory. > > > The best simple model is two identical atoms with a single proton > > nucleus and single electron orbital to determine all the forces. > > > Obviously the strongest force would be the primary, the lesser forces > > it's derivative. > > > The electrical force #1. > > The magnetic force the math from the torque moment caused by the > > electron's orbital with the opposite atoms nucleus. > > Gravity by the sum of all repulsive forces with all the attractive > > forces between both atoms. Where as the nucleus positive force is > > always constant, and the negative forces > > always constant because the protons are concentrated in the tiny > nucleus (perhaps still wave like but more than likely a perfectly > straight horizontal line representing the electric force of the > protons....) > where as the electron is spread along it's bigger orbital. > > > > >momentary (excluding torque) > > in relation to both their orbitals and wave like periods. > > > 2010: Before Einstein and Earthquakes, GUSKZ.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - It means the neutron does not absorb light. Mitch Raemsch
From: Igor on 23 Jun 2010 18:04 On Jun 23, 2:01 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > If as in the prior post, the electron & proton do not truly form a > neutral charge that the answer for ALL the forces can be EASILY > explained, and the foundation for the Unified Field Theory. > > The best simple model is two identical atoms with a single proton > nucleus and single electron orbital to determine all the forces. > > Obviously the strongest force would be the primary, the lesser forces > it's derivative. > > The electrical force #1. > The magnetic force the math from the torque moment caused by the > electron's orbital with the opposite atoms nucleus. > Gravity by the sum of all repulsive forces with all the attractive > forces between both atoms. Where as the nucleus positive force is > always constant, and the negative forces momentary (excluding torque) > in relation to both their orbitals and wave like periods. > > 2010: Before Einstein and Earthquakes, GUSKZ. Congratulations. You just discovered Van der Waals forces. Give this man a cookie. At this rate, you'll be capable of understanding most modern topics in physics within the next couple of years.
From: Androcles on 23 Jun 2010 18:22
"Igor" <thoovler(a)excite.com> wrote in message news:43b934a8-068d-4385-8a7e-94449f922c5f(a)x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... On Jun 23, 2:01 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > If as in the prior post, the electron & proton do not truly form a > neutral charge that the answer for ALL the forces can be EASILY > explained, and the foundation for the Unified Field Theory. > > The best simple model is two identical atoms with a single proton > nucleus and single electron orbital to determine all the forces. > > Obviously the strongest force would be the primary, the lesser forces > it's derivative. > > The electrical force #1. > The magnetic force the math from the torque moment caused by the > electron's orbital with the opposite atoms nucleus. > Gravity by the sum of all repulsive forces with all the attractive > forces between both atoms. Where as the nucleus positive force is > always constant, and the negative forces momentary (excluding torque) > in relation to both their orbitals and wave like periods. > > 2010: Before Einstein and Earthquakes, GUSKZ. Congratulations. You just discovered Van der Waals forces. Give this man a cookie. At this rate, you'll be capable of understanding most modern topics in physics within the next couple of years. ================================================== You talk the talk but you can't walk the walk, hoovler. |