Prev: Multifunction printer
Next: MY PROPOSAL SENT TO B. OBAMA FOR AN IMMEDIATE STOP TO THE DEEP HORIZON BP OIL SPILL ... with proper estimate of results for the Top Kill attempt indeed ( Also Appendix 1 + my letter sent to Premier Barnett with his 3 letters for edification)
From: Doug Jewell on 29 May 2010 21:13 Rod Speed wrote: > Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF " > <""does.tholen.have.many.kook.outs\"@kangarooistan.com.au . wrote: >> Doug Jewell wrote: >>> Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF > wrote: >>> >>> Apple - great product, arsehole company. > >> There products aren't that great. > > They are pretty decent design wise, particularly with the user interface. Agreed. UI is very good on pretty much all apple products. Might take a bit of getting used to if you switch to apple from a competing product, but on the whole, they are very good to use. > > With some rather dinosaury stuff too, like the iphone OS not even being mulitiasking. But it could also be argued that it is that simplicity of design which is a strength. Across the board, apple products are generally under-spec'ed compared to competitor products, but what they do, they do exceptionally well. Compared with Windows Mobile phones for example which are multi-tasking - I get annoyed at mine because if I start the GPS app, or the camera, then switch out of them, they continue to run in the background, and flatten my battery within hours. Neither has an actual "exit" function, so I have to remember that if I use the app, I have to go into task manager and explicitly kill them. Previously I used single-tasking PalmOS - sometimes the single tasking was annoying, but not as annoying as going to use the phone and discovering the battery is dead. > >> For one thing, they aren't prefect or they wouldn't have to worry about faulty product returns. > > No one ever said they were perfect. Nothing ever is, even stuff as basic as cutlery etc. Exactly. > > -- What is the difference between a duck? |