Prev: Equivalent channel impulse response
Next: Scaling issues with fixed point FFT
From: ABBES on 6 May 2010 14:59

>
> Don't forget about the licensing fees.
>
> Dirk
I can't afford it. i was thinking of a (progressive transmission)
algorithm like embedded zero tree wavelet (EZW) or SPIHT...any
thought?
From: Steve Pope on 6 May 2010 15:17
ABBES <abbes.azzi(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

> [attribution lost] wrote,

>> Don't forget about the licensing fees.

Abbes, it is better to include the attribution lines in your posts.

>I can't afford it. i was thinking of a (progressive transmission)
>algorithm like embedded zero tree wavelet (EZW) or SPIHT...any
>thought?

You need to tell us whether your interest is researching algorithms,
or having a good implementation you can obtain quickly.

You're unlikely to be able to out-research the Xvid developers
all on your own.

Steve
From: Clay on 6 May 2010 15:47
On May 6, 12:34 pm, Clay <c...(a)claysturner.com> wrote:
> On May 5, 7:37 pm, ABBES <abbes.a...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > I am looking for the commonly used algorithms to compress images/
> > videos for transmission over the internet. could you please name me
> > these algorithms and/or papers. Cheers
>
> In addition to what others have posted.
>
> video: AVCHD (licensed from Sony and Canon)
>
> still: PNG (unlicensed!!!!!!!)

And while a bit outdated, you can use LZW compression and the GIF
format since the US and European patents for LZW are expired.

Clay

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Equivalent channel impulse response
Next: Scaling issues with fixed point FFT