From: jcdickinson on 21 Sep 2009 07:10 Hey All, New around here :) - thought this might be the best place to get answers. I am trying to develop a service where a user can respond to notification emails to perform certain actions. My original POC relied on Message-ID and the In-Reply-To fields - which works fine on most email clients (including Windows Desktop Outlook). Here is the gotcha - Windows Mobile Outlook is completely non- standards-compliant in this regard; and on top of this the Thread- Index (which is a Microsoft invention - so I am very suprised). I have messed around and inspected headers and Googled for hours to no avail. Does anyone have any other ideas? Maybe a registry setting to enable this? I tried attaching an alternate view with a nonce-bytes; but Exchange immediately (and most probably, rightly so) rejected it as spam. I doubt Outlook Mobile would even include this alternate view in the reply. Thanks a ton guys. Jonathan Dickinson
From: jcdickinson on 21 Sep 2009 07:43 Okay, so I did a little more experimentation and it looks like "Reply All" keeps the Thread-Index sane. Why not In-Reply-To? This locks me into Exchange-based deployments. And why only when "Reply All" is used? On Sep 21, 1:10 pm, jcdickinson <jonathand...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hey All, > > New around here :) - thought this might be the best place to get > answers. > > I am trying to develop a service where a user can respond to > notification emails to perform certain actions. My original POC relied > on Message-ID and the In-Reply-To fields - which works fine on most > email clients (including Windows Desktop Outlook). > > Here is the gotcha - Windows Mobile Outlook is completely non- > standards-compliant in this regard; and on top of this the Thread- > Index (which is a Microsoft invention - so I am very suprised). I have > messed around and inspected headers and Googled for hours to no avail. > > Does anyone have any other ideas? Maybe a registry setting to enable > this? I tried attaching an alternate view with a nonce-bytes; but > Exchange immediately (and most probably, rightly so) rejected it as > spam. I doubt Outlook Mobile would even include this alternate view in > the reply. > > Thanks a ton guys. > > Jonathan Dickinson
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Send Again Next: WM 5.0 InternetErrorDlg return ERROR_INVALID_HANDLE |