In history the fact that the moon fits over the sun was proof of God
in [Relativity]
|
From: BURT on 29 May 2010 23:22 The beginning of mankind started with the eclipse. How long will that perfect fit last? I believe this is a sign of a God who created the universe and life. It is for the beginning. Mitch Raemsch
From: Allan Matthews on 30 May 2010 00:03 In article <61922ef9-8c7c-4bd0-b0b0-506c8ef59cc2 @u20g2000pru.googlegroups.com>, macromitch(a)yahoo.com says... > > The beginning of mankind started with the eclipse. How do you figure that? Watch "2001" while stoned again? > How long will that perfect fit last? The "fit" is not perfect, as annular eclipses, for example, demonstrate. > I believe this is a sign of a God who created the universe and life. Well, that's a leap. A stupid one at that. > It is for the beginning. Say what? allan -- allan_matthews[at]bigfoot[dot]com ========================================= "And the moral of the story? Don't leave things in the fridge." =========================================
From: BURT on 30 May 2010 00:05 On May 29, 9:03 pm, Allan Matthews <allan_matth...(a)bigfoot.com> wrote: > In article <61922ef9-8c7c-4bd0-b0b0-506c8ef59cc2 > @u20g2000pru.googlegroups.com>, macromi...(a)yahoo.com says... > > > > > The beginning of mankind started with the eclipse. > > How do you figure that? Watch "2001" while stoned again? > > > How long will that perfect fit last? > > The "fit" is not perfect, as annular eclipses, for example, demonstrate. > > > I believe this is a sign of a God who created the universe and life. > > Well, that's a leap. A stupid one at that. > > > It is for the beginning. > > Say what? > > allan > -- > allan_matthews[at]bigfoot[dot]com > ========================================= > "And the moral of the story? > Don't leave things in the fridge." > ========================================= God doesn't need to prove that He exists. But He left evidence. Mitch Raemsch
From: Jimbo on 30 May 2010 00:12 On May 30, 12:05 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 29, 9:03 pm, Allan Matthews <allan_matth...(a)bigfoot.com> wrote: > > > > > > > In article <61922ef9-8c7c-4bd0-b0b0-506c8ef59cc2 > > @u20g2000pru.googlegroups.com>, macromi...(a)yahoo.com says... > > > > The beginning of mankind started with the eclipse. > > > How do you figure that? Watch "2001" while stoned again? > > > > How long will that perfect fit last? > > > The "fit" is not perfect, as annular eclipses, for example, demonstrate.. > > > > I believe this is a sign of a God who created the universe and life. > > > Well, that's a leap. A stupid one at that. > > > > It is for the beginning. > > > Say what? > > > allan > > -- > > allan_matthews[at]bigfoot[dot]com > > ========================================= > > "And the moral of the story? > > Don't leave things in the fridge." > > ========================================= > > God doesn't need to prove that He exists. He does if he wants to convince me. > But He left evidence. > Not a scrap of objective, verifiable evidence did he leave.
From: BURT on 30 May 2010 00:44
On May 29, 9:12 pm, Jimbo <ckdbig...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 30, 12:05 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 29, 9:03 pm, Allan Matthews <allan_matth...(a)bigfoot.com> wrote: > > > > In article <61922ef9-8c7c-4bd0-b0b0-506c8ef59cc2 > > > @u20g2000pru.googlegroups.com>, macromi...(a)yahoo.com says... > > > > > The beginning of mankind started with the eclipse. > > > > How do you figure that? Watch "2001" while stoned again? > > > > > How long will that perfect fit last? > > > > The "fit" is not perfect, as annular eclipses, for example, demonstrate. > > > > > I believe this is a sign of a God who created the universe and life.. > > > > Well, that's a leap. A stupid one at that. > > > > > It is for the beginning. > > > > Say what? > > > > allan > > > -- > > > allan_matthews[at]bigfoot[dot]com > > > ========================================= > > > "And the moral of the story? > > > Don't leave things in the fridge." > > > ========================================= > > > God doesn't need to prove that He exists. > > He does if he wants to convince me. > > > But He left evidence. > > Not a scrap of objective, verifiable evidence did he leave.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Why would God want to convince you in any way? Maybe you could be His robot then. Mitch Raemsch |