From: Zeus Mu + s on
The ability to state P=/=NP perpetuates lies.

In the claim P=/=NP lies perpetuate.

Let A=The ability to state P=/=NP:

Proof:

To state the ability to state the ability
lies therein the problem A: -1P = NP if =/=1PA: -1P = NP
If =/=1PA: -1P = NP
Iff ==1PA: NP
A:P = NP -infinity -A

Musatov
From: Teejack on

"Zeus Mu + s" <scriber17(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:a55c9508-5277-45be-8b0e-02e6a9a9fcdb(a)r39g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> The ability to state P=/=NP perpetuates lies.
>
> In the claim P=/=NP lies perpetuate.
>
> Let A=The ability to state P=/=NP:
>
> Proof:
>
> To state the ability to state the ability
> lies therein the problem A: -1P = NP if =/=1PA: -1P = NP
> If =/=1PA: -1P = NP
> Iff ==1PA: NP
> A:P = NP -infinity -A
>
> Musatov

So where's the beef? This is philosophy, so the art of communicating should
not be pre-empted by the need to "do the math" or to demonstrate that you
can, in fact, do the math.
Can you not explain what you think it means? If I was to show you my new
cellphone, I wouldn't show you the schematics of the circuitry, now would I?
I think I'll chase pi to the end of its imaginary endlessness - show you a
thing or two, or three, or four, or five........