From: Claudius Denk on
On Aug 4, 6:43 am, "Tim Golden BandTech.com" <tttppp...(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Wed 04 Aug 2010 09:29:51 AM EDThttp://groups.google.com/group/alt.philosophy/browse_frm/thread/be41c...
> On Aug 4, 3:24 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 3, 11:52 am, "Tim Golden BandTech.com" <tttppp...(a)yahoo.com>
>
> > Actually, no. But that's only because I prefer a manifold system
> > (especially if it is a manifold system that is replete with vortex
> > dampers) as the primary means to achieve stablilization. Self
> > correction is, in my mind, a bit of a pipe dream. Especially after
> > the experiments by Hollywell.
>
> The most relevant link I can find is
>
> http://www.flintshirechronicle.co.uk/flintshire-news/local-flintshire...
> which is not what you are cryptically communicating. Then too I find
> http://mathforum.org/kb/plaintext.jspa?messageID=7144057
> but this is an accurate portrayal of your style of communication.
> I feel pretty sure that your position is flawed, otherwise you would
> expose more clean information.

Well, it depends on whether you've discombobulated the fragostad.
(Either that or you need to install a fragostad inhibitor.) In my
experience this is where most people drop the ball. But you aren't
providing me enough information to tell for sure.

> I am forced to such inference because
> there is no actual information in your position, other than roughly
> four keywords that lead me only very short distances from this thread,
> and in one case zero distance. Please, if you are coherent, then be
> coherent.

I apologize if the terminology I use is outside your realm of
experience. You might try contacting a gentleman by the name of
Michael Tobis. (He's associated with realclimate.org. Try searching
for him in Google or Bing.) I think he speaks your language.