Prev: Calculating the spectra and intensity of Helium, Lithium and Beryllium using only Rydberg-like formulas
Next: 'Plutonium' as a surname
From: Claudius Denk on 4 Aug 2010 13:35 On Aug 4, 6:43 am, "Tim Golden BandTech.com" <tttppp...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Wed 04 Aug 2010 09:29:51 AM EDThttp://groups.google.com/group/alt.philosophy/browse_frm/thread/be41c... > On Aug 4, 3:24 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > On Aug 3, 11:52 am, "Tim Golden BandTech.com" <tttppp...(a)yahoo.com> > > > Actually, no. But that's only because I prefer a manifold system > > (especially if it is a manifold system that is replete with vortex > > dampers) as the primary means to achieve stablilization. Self > > correction is, in my mind, a bit of a pipe dream. Especially after > > the experiments by Hollywell. > > The most relevant link I can find is > > http://www.flintshirechronicle.co.uk/flintshire-news/local-flintshire... > which is not what you are cryptically communicating. Then too I find > http://mathforum.org/kb/plaintext.jspa?messageID=7144057 > but this is an accurate portrayal of your style of communication. > I feel pretty sure that your position is flawed, otherwise you would > expose more clean information. Well, it depends on whether you've discombobulated the fragostad. (Either that or you need to install a fragostad inhibitor.) In my experience this is where most people drop the ball. But you aren't providing me enough information to tell for sure. > I am forced to such inference because > there is no actual information in your position, other than roughly > four keywords that lead me only very short distances from this thread, > and in one case zero distance. Please, if you are coherent, then be > coherent. I apologize if the terminology I use is outside your realm of experience. You might try contacting a gentleman by the name of Michael Tobis. (He's associated with realclimate.org. Try searching for him in Google or Bing.) I think he speaks your language. |