Inertial vs Gravitational
in [Physics]
|
Prev: best way of testing Dirac's new radioactivities additive creation Chapt 14 #163; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Mind Control Goes Public (MUST WATCH VIDEOS)
From: Ian Macmillan on 15 Jun 2010 02:30 These items may be interesting: http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/25331/ Also: arxiv.org/abs/1006.1988: Inertial And Gravitational Mass In Quantum Mechanics All the best Ian Macmillan
From: Y.Porat on 15 Jun 2010 04:00 On Jun 15, 8:30 am, "Ian Macmillan" <iand...(a)tpg.com.au> wrote: > These items may be interesting: > > http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/25331/ > > Also: arxiv.org/abs/1006.1988: Inertial And Gravitational Mass In Quantum > Mechanics > > All the best > Ian Macmillan ---------------------------- i took a little quote from the above quote It turns out that physicists already play with exactly this kind of set up: the so-called atom trampoline, in which a matter wave falls under the influence of gravity but is bounced by an electromagnetic force. They calculate that the energy eigenvalues of the atom are proportional to the (gravitational mass)^2/3 but to the (inertial mass)^-1/3. end of quote -------------------- here you see how prejudice is ruling 'modern physics ' th e i mediate *automatic* prejudiced *assumption was that ' there is a difference between some mass that behaves one way in 'gravitational field and another way in an EM field '' but were is the creative imagination ??!! ie that there is just one kind of mass!! BUT IT IS UNDER DIFFERENT SITUATION (ACTION REACTION ) DONE BY THE DIFFERENT IN **DIFFERENT KINDS FIELDS** !! ??? so in order to look about the different kinds of mass better look for the different properties of those fields !!! old Catto said NO MASS (THE ONLY ONE !!!)- NO REAL PHYSICS !! so old Catto is going to save you a lot of money, time ,and huge human resources !!! ATB Y.Porat ----------------------------
From: BURT on 15 Jun 2010 14:39 On Jun 15, 1:00 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 15, 8:30 am, "Ian Macmillan" <iand...(a)tpg.com.au> wrote: > > > These items may be interesting: > > >http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/25331/ > > > Also: arxiv.org/abs/1006.1988: Inertial And Gravitational Mass In Quantum > > Mechanics > > > All the best > > Ian Macmillan > > ---------------------------- > i took a little quote from the above > > quote > It turns out that physicists already play with exactly this kind of > set up: the so-called atom trampoline, in which a matter wave falls > under the influence of gravity but is bounced by an electromagnetic > force. They calculate that the energy eigenvalues of the atom are > proportional to the (gravitational mass)^2/3 but to the (inertial > mass)^-1/3. > end of quote > -------------------- > here you see how prejudice is ruling > 'modern physics ' > th e i mediate *automatic* prejudiced *assumption was > > that > ' there is a difference > between some mass that behaves > one way in 'gravitational field > and another way > in an EM field '' > > but were is the creative imagination ??!! > > ie > that there is just one kind of mass!! > > BUT IT IS UNDER DIFFERENT > SITUATION (ACTION REACTION ) > DONE BY > THE DIFFERENT IN > **DIFFERENT KINDS FIELDS** !! ??? > so > in order to look about the different kinds of mass > better look for the different properties of those fields !!! > > old Catto said > > NO MASS (THE ONLY ONE !!!)- > NO REAL PHYSICS !! > > so old Catto is going to save you > a lot of money, time ,and huge human resources !!! > ATB > Y.Porat > ---------------------------- It is all infinjitely dense C squared energy that flows through space. This Gamma mass. Mitch Raemsch
From: eric gisse on 15 Jun 2010 20:03
Ian Macmillan wrote: > These items may be interesting: > > http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/25331/ > > Also: arxiv.org/abs/1006.1988: Inertial And Gravitational Mass In Quantum > Mechanics > > All the best > Ian Macmillan Neat. Can't wait to see someone take a shot. |