Installing MDAC 5 for sp5
in [Visual Basic]
|
Prev: Running a VB6 program under Windows 7 XP Mode (sorry for x-post)
Next: VB6 Data missing when writing to a text file.
From: jerryys on 18 Jan 2010 23:25 its not really the same question, new info is provided. you are assuming that the first responses yielded a completely successful solution. and what is wrong to see what another newsgroup that specializes in deployment generally may say? but i do agree in principle generally about duplication, i probably could have done a better job. jerryys "MikeD" wrote: > > > "jerryys" <jerryys(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:6C246DAF-2BD4-4B51-A411-D13CE81CDA66(a)microsoft.com... > > thanks i will try. any ideas as to the deployment wizard not working but > > just > > hanging with a PDMAN 98 not responding. but when i move the same project > > file > > to a 32 bit system the wizard works great, so its not in the project file > > generated > > in the 64 bit system. thanks > > > > > Please quit asking the same question over and over. That's at least 3 that I > count now (and one of those multiposted to a different newsgroup). You're > just making things harder on people. > > -- > Mike > > > . >
From: MikeD on 19 Jan 2010 18:04 "jerryys" <jerryys(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:55DC31B5-2014-49F8-958A-EBD8BF158095(a)microsoft.com... > its not really the same question Yes. it is. You asked -- any ideas as to the deployment wizard not working but just hanging with a PDMAN 98 not responding. but when i move the same project file to a 32 bit system the wizard works great, so its not in the project file generated in the 64 bit system. thanks -- twice in THIS thread (that has NOTHING to do with this latest question) and then asked this EXACT question again in another newsgroup. >>, new info is provided. And therein lies the problem. This new info is all scattered about. >you are assuming that > the first responses yielded a completely successful solution. I'm not assuming anything. Facts are facts. -- Mike
From: jerryys on 19 Jan 2010 22:44 i actually thought i gracefully conceded to your assumptions. that was not enough. sorry, but listen the main purpose of these postings is to resolve problems. clearly you did not offer any advice relative to the problem. unless thats your job, you actually wasted a lot of your own time. jerryys "MikeD" wrote: > > > "jerryys" <jerryys(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:55DC31B5-2014-49F8-958A-EBD8BF158095(a)microsoft.com... > > its not really the same question > > Yes. it is. You asked > > -- > any ideas as to the deployment wizard not working but just > hanging with a PDMAN 98 not responding. but when i move the same project > file > to a 32 bit system the wizard works great, so its not in the project file > generated > in the 64 bit system. thanks > -- > > twice in THIS thread (that has NOTHING to do with this latest question) and > then asked this EXACT question again in another newsgroup. > > >>, new info is provided. > > And therein lies the problem. This new info is all scattered about. > > >you are assuming that > > the first responses yielded a completely successful solution. > > I'm not assuming anything. Facts are facts. > > -- > Mike > > > . >
From: jerryys on 19 Jan 2010 22:52 mike are you the same person on the deployment group? your personalities are entirely different. is it really so important to nit pick a innocent mistake? jerryys "MikeD" wrote: > > > "jerryys" <jerryys(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:55DC31B5-2014-49F8-958A-EBD8BF158095(a)microsoft.com... > > its not really the same question > > Yes. it is. You asked > > -- > any ideas as to the deployment wizard not working but just > hanging with a PDMAN 98 not responding. but when i move the same project > file > to a 32 bit system the wizard works great, so its not in the project file > generated > in the 64 bit system. thanks > -- > > twice in THIS thread (that has NOTHING to do with this latest question) and > then asked this EXACT question again in another newsgroup. > > >>, new info is provided. > > And therein lies the problem. This new info is all scattered about. > > >you are assuming that > > the first responses yielded a completely successful solution. > > I'm not assuming anything. Facts are facts. > > -- > Mike > > > . >
From: MikeD on 20 Jan 2010 11:39
"jerryys" <jerryys(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:E03318E1-4816-482C-95F2-4DDBCC7F058E(a)microsoft.com... > mike are you the same person on the deployment group? your personalities are > entirely different. is it really so important to nit pick a innocent mistake? > Would you have known it was a mistake otherwise? -- Mike |