From: fortune.bruce on
new FBI Director William S. Sessions assured Reagan that there was
% a solid basis for the investigation: "We knew CISPES was established
% from funding by the Communist Party, U.S.A."


Well, Reagan didn't like a peaceful Texas based group called CISPES, which
was against the United States' support of the El Salvador government.

The El Salvador government was torturing and killing people.

* "Officers held in Salvador Abductions", By James LeMoyne, NYT, 4/25/86
*
* One of those arrested was accused of killing the head of the Salvadoran
* Land Reform Institute and two AMERICAN agrarian advisors.

So the FBI had one of their agents infiltrate CISPES using a Frank
Varelli, who was born in San Salvador and served in the U.S. Army.

# "How the FBI infiltrated CISPES and Assisted the Salvadoran Right Wing"
# By James Ridgeway, The Village Voice, NYC
#
# Varelli met with the Salvadoran National Guard, best known for its
# death squads. They gave him a "hit list" of people they wanted.
#
# When the INS stopped a Salvadoran immigrant, it would call the FBI and
# check the name against the list.
#
# If the detained person's name was on the list, the INS would institute
# deportation proceedings, opposing bail on "national security" grounds.
#
# Varelli would call the Salvadoran National Guard to let them know the
# individual was on his way home. In this way, the FBI assisted, over a
# three-year period, the work of the Salvadoran death squads.

That's right: the FBI murders people.

* "FBI Killed Unarmed Man, Inquiry Shows", The New York Times, 1/14/97
*
* A 21-year-old murder suspect who the FBI said they shot only after he
* opened fire


From: JSH on
* But once again, like a car salesman trying to make his monthly quota,
* Freeh pushes too hard. First of all, his claim that there are now
* nearly three times more homicides than in 1960 ignored the important
* fact that the nation's population grew substantially during that period.
*
* When this factor is taken into account, the picture still looks bad, but
* not quite as bad as Freeh suggested. While the *numbers* of murders did
* indeed almost triple, the murder *rate* barely doubled:
*
* In 1992, 10.4 murders per 100,000 people
* In 1960, 4.7 murders per 100,000 people
*
* Amazing as it may seem that a leading law enforcement official might
* try to buttress his cases through the selective use of statistics, that
* was hardly the end of it.
*
* When the FBI director selected the years to illuminate his thesis for the
* National Press Club, he compared a year when the nation's homicide rate
* was at one of its *all-time lowest* points to that of a year when the rate
* was near its *all-time high*. [extended discussion of homicides followed]
*
* Such selective use of statistics is dishonest.
*
* It is impossible to know what was going through Louis Freeh's mind as he
* delivered his distorted, exaggerated and fundamentally flawed crime speech
* to the National Press Club.
*
* We do know however, that for many decades, law enforcement officials
* across the nation have advanced their careers and promoted their
* political agendas by chanting the same Mantra of the Scary Numbers.

Louis Freeh: "The polls prove people are fed up with crime"
This book contains a DEVASTATING accounting of the manipulation
of people's perception of crime rates. [not shown!]
Fear, loathing, and somehow the public clamoring for a Police State.

* Police chiefs, prosecutors, judges, FBI directors and the politicians who
* suppor


From: Risto Lankinen on
security problem, which must be managed.
>
[snip]
>
> The terminology "email monitoring" has a Big-Brother ring to it.
>
> But monitor it we must - there is no choice.
>
> It connects all of our inside systems to all of outside.
>
> And it is the Internet ("public wire") traffic going in/out of Salomon
> we are checking - not internal email.
>
> The security rule for Internet traffic is "don't send anything you
> wouldn't want to read about in tomorrow's newspaper".

I think it's pretty obvious why company traffic involving company systems
is monitored. After all, companies aren't democracies.

Finally, I should point out that all the people at both sites were told
repeatedly that Internet email was being monitored; this includes all
traffic picked up by my JobTalk analytic:

> Salomon site.
>
> All sites start out with the employment contract stating unequivocally
> that the systems are the company's and are to be used only for work
> purposes. And that they are subject to inspection. You signed it.
>
> Salomon's goes further by stating the firm's computer systems may be
> audited and that they have the right to do so even if you have put
> personal information on the system.
>
> After the first couple of months of security incidents at Salomon,
> they began issuing global email broadcasts saying that a new security
> package "Internet Risk Management: email facility" had been installed,
> and that Internet email traffic was actively being monitored.
>
> They did so again and again.
>
> I think they sent out a memo to everyone too.
>
> Security incidents NEVER stopped.
>
> Major violations occurred again and again and again and again...



From: Risto Lankinen on
Times:
*
* President Clinton held the pretty red, white and blue "smart card" in
* his hand when he addressed the nation, proudly waving it like a small
* American flag.
*
* Only it wasn't a flag; it was a "health security card"---his slick
* name for a national identity card. Under his plan a new National
* Health Board would establish "national, unique identifier numbers"
* for every single one of us.
*
* Fortunately, President Bill Clinton's healthcare scam never made it
* into law. Sadly, few of the complainers were upset about the potential
* for abuse by Big Brother.
*
* Shortly after being elected, one Clinton advisor promoting the biochip
* 'mark' is Dr. Mary Jane England, a member of Hillary Clinton's ill-fated
* socialized, national healthcare initiative. Addressing a conference
* sponsored by computer giant IBM [IBM's Lotus division takes hand biometrics
* of employees who use their childcare facilities] in Palm Springs,
* California, in 1994, England not only endorsed the proposed mandatory
* national I.D. smart card, but went one scary step further:
*
* The smart card is a wonderful idea, but even better would be the
* capacity to not have a card, and I call it "a chip in your ear,"
* that would actually access your medical records, so that no matter
* where you were, even if you came into an emergency room unconscious,
* we would have some capacity to access that medical record.
*
* We need to go beyond the narrow conceptualization of the smart card
* and really use some of the technology that's out there.
*
* California Governor Pete Wilson has actively stumped for a National I.D.
* Card system, using the straw man of California's pervasive i


From: JSH on
War #4 - Terrorism
--- -- ---------

Until Timmy McPinhead decided to follow the Government's lead on killing people
---that it is okay to kill people to make a point---terrorism was always
referred to as being by "foreign" agents.

After the explosion, President Clinton called for FBI agents to be able to
tap phones at will, as they can do now for organized crime. In other words,
not only was there the OKC bombing terroristic act, the Government freedom
terrorists then demanded even greater Police State powers over all of us.

Internet signature in alt.activism.militia...

In 1794, James Madison pointed out "the old trick of turning every
contingency into a resource for accumulating force in the government."

----

I don't know any terrorists or foreign agents.

But the government seems to know plenty of people who are terrorists.

: The New York Times, 2/10/87
: "Is This America?", by Anthony Lewis
:
: She is 22 years old, a student in San Diego, California. She was born
: in Ramallah, in the West Bank, came to this country at the age of 3.
:
: She is an American citi