Interference from cassette player
in [UK Mac]
|
Prev: Complex page numbering in documents?
Next: Special characters in file names and cross-platform compatibility
From: Rowland McDonnell on 23 May 2010 08:42 zoara <me18(a)privacy.net> wrote: > Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: [snip] > > >but is switchable to allow the iPod controls to control the music. > > > Safer, easier, cheaper, less frustrating. > > > > What's wrong with using plain ordinary analogue line connections for > > the > > music signal, eh? > > They don't charge the iPhone. Erm? What I was thinking - bearing in mind that I know the audio output socket is not useful for charging an iPhone/iPod - is that one could use the normal connector for charging, and use the headphone output socket feeding an amplifier's line in socket for transmitting the audio signal. It seems such a simple idea that I didn't think I had to explain it in full - but it seems that zoara here is rather hard of thinking, so I had to write it out in full for the poor dear. Rowland. -- Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org Sorry - the spam got to me http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: Rowland McDonnell on 23 May 2010 09:08 Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote: > Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > [snip] > > And you did make it > > plain you thought it was best done in software. > > I didn't - I don't, I believe it is best not done and have never said > anything to indicate it is best done in software. But you are lying - as usual. I've caught you out, and now you're just trying to deny it. Malicious lying git that you are - you just love winding me up to watch me howl, don't you? Ever thought of getting some professional help to deal with that morbid obsession you suffer from? [snip] The post you made - quoted below - makes it plain to me that you think AGC is best done in software; why else specify `you dont want the hardware messing around with gain'; obviously, that implies very plainly that you think the AGC should be done in software. If you didn't mean that, then you would not have used the qualifier `hardware'. ====================================================================== Path: uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk (Woody) Newsgroups: uk.comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Interference from cassette player Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 14:21:47 +0100 Lines: 25 Message-ID: <1jiqrxz.6d5gqj1cjpx1wN%usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote: > > > Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > [snip] > > > > Hmm - is there a software AGC anywhere? > > > > > > Rowland. > > > (who likes AGCs, when properly applied) > > > > You can get software AGC in various apps, yes, but it would kill audio > > applications if it had been put in hardware. > > I don't see why. > > I process audio on my Mac that was recorded using an AGC, so what do you > mean? recording any audio from an outboard mixer or for reliable input, you dont want the hardware messing round with the gain -- Woody ====================================================================== Rowland. -- Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org Sorry - the spam got to me http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: zoara on 23 May 2010 20:47
Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > zoara <me18(a)privacy.net> wrote: > > > Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> > > wrote: > [snip] > > > >but is switchable to allow the iPod controls to control the > > > > music. > > > > Safer, easier, cheaper, less frustrating. > > > > > > What's wrong with using plain ordinary analogue line connections > > > for > > > the > > > music signal, eh? > > > > They don't charge the iPhone. > > Erm? > > What I was thinking - bearing in mind that I know the audio output > socket is not useful for charging an iPhone/iPod - is that one could > use > the normal connector for charging, and use the headphone output socket > feeding an amplifier's line in socket for transmitting the audio > signal. > > It seems such a simple idea that I didn't think I had to explain it in > full - but it seems that zoara here is rather hard of thinking, so I > had > to write it out in full for the poor dear. Why do you think I didn't understand? You asked what was wrong with "plain audio cables". I told you, and your comment doesn't change the problem I have with them. -z- -- email: nettid1 at fastmail dot fm |