Prev: Internet Explorer 8: C:\Program Files\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe vs C:\Program Files (x86)\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe
Next: Any Windows 7 News Groups
From: Bobby Johnson on 14 Feb 2010 12:06 645-bit Windows 7 should serve you well. Ultimate does come in both 32-bit and 64-bit, but but that's not really significant. If you find any 16-bit based program that won't run on 64-bit you can always install a Virtual Machine program and run most of those type programs there. Microsoft has an XP Mode VM for Win 7 Professional and Ultimate. And, if you really need to run some old programs, there is DOSBox. So, enjoy you 64-bit Win 7! On 2010-02-14 11:40, Nathan Sokalski wrote: > The reason I am using a 64-bit version of Windows is because: > > 1. That is the version that came with my new computer > 2. I believe 64-bit is the only version of Windows 7 Ultimate that > exists (although I'd have to double-check > 3. I wanted to move forward, and since most my stuff works on 64-bit > (and the few things that don't, well, I'm in the tech field, so I enjoy > figuring out how to make it work or what would make a good workaround or > alternative) I saw no reason to wait > > Is there something that you have against 64-bit? The only people that I > thought had a problem with it were some of the hardware and plug-in > makers that decided to wait so long to make 64-bit drivers and updates. > 64-bit isn't new, even though not a lot of people used them, there were > 64-bit versions of XP and Vista, so I would think that most hardware > makers would offer some kind of 64-bit driver and places like Adobe > would have made a 64-bit version of stuff like Flash that virtually > everyone uses. But I'm a patient person, I enjoy looking for workarounds > and alternatives, I'm a patient person, and Microsoft was smart enough > to give Windows 7 users a 32 and 64-bit version of IE8, so what do I > have to complain about? |