From: Dave C. on 21 Dec 2007 10:30 "Budgie" <pju(a)hotpop.com> wrote in message news:LmJaj.12153$745.4703(a)newsfe1-win.ntli.net... > > If you run XP SP2 and Explorer 6, and if you've been faithfully installing > updates, go to Add/remove programs and remove Security Update 942615. > > I did, and it now works perfectly again. > > Thanks for the tip, Budgie. I have XP SP2, Explorer 6 and my updates are current. I don't know if this affects the registry, but I will back it up with ERUNT just in case. Regards, Dave C.
From: Budgie on 21 Dec 2007 11:07 "Dave C." <myaddress(a)microsoft.com> wrote in message news:p9adneVQ-ZuvQfbanZ2dnUVZ_sCtnZ2d(a)comcast.com... >> > Thanks for the tip, Budgie. I have XP SP2, Explorer 6 and my updates are > current. I don't know if this affects the registry, but I will back it up > with ERUNT just in case. > It is a known problem for Microsoft. There is another work-around which involves modifying the registry, which is in the Knowledge Base - Article ID 946627 of 19 Dec 2007. However, deletion seems to work just as well! I also had to set that particular update not to download again. -- Budgie NB Reply to newsgroup. Email address will get you nowhere.
From: Paul on 21 Dec 2007 11:13 Budgie wrote: > "Dave C." <myaddress(a)microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:p9adneVQ-ZuvQfbanZ2dnUVZ_sCtnZ2d(a)comcast.com... >> Thanks for the tip, Budgie. I have XP SP2, Explorer 6 and my updates are >> current. I don't know if this affects the registry, but I will back it up >> with ERUNT just in case. >> > > It is a known problem for Microsoft. > > There is another work-around which involves modifying the registry, which is > in the Knowledge Base - Article ID 946627 of 19 Dec 2007. > > However, deletion seems to work just as well! > > I also had to set that particular update not to download again. > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=CC096493-367D-4D28-80AB-2A70139AE839&displaylang=en 946627 is a download now. Page is dated 12/20/2007. I saw this mentioned in reader comments on Anandtech. So instead of registry hacking, now there is an executable to run. Paul
From: Dave C. on 21 Dec 2007 13:00 "Paul" <nospam(a)needed.com> wrote in message news:fkgojr$l4h$1(a)aioe.org... > Budgie wrote: >> "Dave C." <myaddress(a)microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:p9adneVQ-ZuvQfbanZ2dnUVZ_sCtnZ2d(a)comcast.com... >>> Thanks for the tip, Budgie. I have XP SP2, Explorer 6 and my updates >>> are current. I don't know if this affects the registry, but I will back >>> it up with ERUNT just in case. >>> >> >> It is a known problem for Microsoft. >> >> There is another work-around which involves modifying the registry, which >> is in the Knowledge Base - Article ID 946627 of 19 Dec 2007. >> >> However, deletion seems to work just as well! >> >> I also had to set that particular update not to download again. >> > > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=CC096493-367D-4D28-80AB-2A70139AE839&displaylang=en > > 946627 is a download now. Page is dated 12/20/2007. I saw this > mentioned in reader comments on Anandtech. So instead of > registry hacking, now there is an executable to run. > > Paul Paul, just ran update from the above link with total success. I am keeping all the information you and Budgie in a separate file for future reference. I suspect (and would hope) that a future Microsoft update will include this. Thanks for making this information quickly available. Dave C.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Asus notebook drivers Next: HP Smart Web Printing ? memory could not be read |