Intro to "The Theory of Reality"
in [Relativity]
|
From: glird on 27 Mar 2010 11:25 The following bit is from the introductory remarks of the that book. ______________ The thesis herein developed is that a continuum of substance fills all space in the known cosmos; that this substance is an amorphous fluid; that it is everywhere and always the conducting medium for energies; that this material is subject to changes of volume hence is intrinsically compressible; that pressure changes alter the degree of compression of this material; that under the influence of such pressure-density patterning, self persisting units of material occur; and that such units, always contiguous either to each other or to material in unorganized free form, are the things out of which ponderable matter is made. We shall find that the kinetic atomic theory (matter is made of ultimate particles) got in the way of correct understanding of the equations that describe and generalize experimental results and of the physical experiments that helped refine those equations. As we study the actions of a real material that has no voids anywhere, as compared against the explanations based on a void space with particles scattered about within it, you will gradually understand many things. As you do you will see why the basic-particle theory is responsible for the present belief that nature is ultimately incomprehensible to Man, thus why mathematical equations have replaced comprehension as the goal of theoretical physics. You will see why some of our deeply embedded mental programs need to be changed and how incredibly hard it is to do that. Along the way perhaps you may find some samples of the fun and games Science can be. ... Anyone and everyone makes mistakes. I do not fault the heroes who made them nor claim any superior wisdom for having found them. Just the opposite ... It is always easier to pore over the beaten trail set down by others, to laboriously check their every step in search of the slightest bimpy flaw, than it was to blaze the virgin trail itself. I still remain that same observer, far back in the pack, who started out so long ago one day to see what our scouts were up to as they sought the Truth that would free us all. They still remain the full-fledged heroes now, that they were to me before I began after them. I see the brick walls relativists see, but I know they are chimerical holograms that only seem to block our way. In order to convince you of that, so we can go on with the real story - the metaphysics and what follows, it is necessary that the brain-washed reader be re- programmed; that he no longer sees mythical walls that aren't there: that he finally understands that matter truly exists and the world is exactly as real as it appears to be to a normal person. Even though there are details too small or large for him to hear or see or touch or smell, there are no details he cannot understand. That is where we are going. We will not be attacking Einstein as we race along the many trails he opened. Rather, the intent is to refine the course and clear the way to those far horizons and open vistas my True Heroes always sought. "... when I look back upon the long and torturous road which finally led to [the quantum's] disclosure, this development strikes me at times as a new illustration of Goethe's saying, that `man errs, so long as he is striving.' And all the mental effort of an assiduous investigator must indeed appear vain and hopeless, if he does not occasionally run across striking facts that form incontrovertible proof of the truth he seeks, and show him that after all he has moved at least one step nearer to his objective." Max Planck. Anyone who does not have tears in his eyes as he finishes reading Plancks words has never sought Truth nor found a portion of it. and will never understand my motives. Anyone who has, for inexplicable reasons does. ________________ glird
From: Robakks on 27 Mar 2010 14:09 "glird" <glird(a)aol.com> news:4a6eff9e-531c-475d-9eac-a7f54e8d8cea(a)o30g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > The following bit is from the introductory remarks of the that book. > ______________ > > The thesis herein developed is that a continuum of substance fills > all space in the known cosmos; that this substance is an amorphous > fluid; that it is everywhere and always the conducting medium for > energies; that this material is subject to changes of volume hence is > intrinsically compressible; that pressure changes alter the degree of > compression of this material; that under the influence of such > pressure-density patterning, self persisting units of material occur; > and that such units, always contiguous either to each other or to > material in unorganized free form, are the things out of which > ponderable matter is made. > We shall find that the kinetic atomic theory (matter is made of > ultimate particles) got in the way of correct understanding of the > equations that describe and generalize experimental results and of the > physical experiments that helped refine those equations. As we study > the actions of a real material that has no voids anywhere, as compared > against the explanations based on a void space with particles > scattered about within it, you will gradually understand many things. > As you do you will see why the basic-particle theory is responsible > for the present belief that nature is ultimately incomprehensible to > Man, thus why mathematical equations have replaced comprehension as > the goal of theoretical physics. You will see why some of our deeply > embedded mental programs need to be changed and how incredibly > hard it is to do that. Along the way perhaps you may find some samples > of the fun and games Science can be. > ... > > Anyone and everyone makes mistakes. I do not fault the heroes who > made them nor claim any superior wisdom for having found them. Just > the opposite ... It is always easier to pore over the beaten trail > set down by others, to laboriously check their every step in search of > the slightest bimpy flaw, than it was to blaze the virgin trail > itself. I still remain that same observer, far back in the pack, who > started out so long ago one day to see what our scouts were up to as > they sought the Truth that would free us all. They still remain the > full-fledged heroes now, that they were to me before I began after > them. > > I see the brick walls relativists see, but I know they are chimerical > holograms that only seem to block our way. In order to convince you of > that, so we can go on with the real story - the metaphysics and what > follows, it is necessary that the brain-washed reader be re- > programmed; that he no longer sees mythical walls that aren't there: > that he finally understands that matter truly exists and the world is > exactly as real as it appears to be to a normal person. Even though > there are details too small or large for him to hear or see or touch > or smell, there are no details he cannot understand. > That is where we are going. > > We will not be attacking Einstein as we race along the many trails he > opened. Rather, the intent is to refine the course and clear the way > to those far horizons and open vistas my True Heroes always sought. > "... when I look back upon the long and torturous road > which finally led to [the quantum's] disclosure, this > development strikes me at times as a new illustration > of Goethe's saying, that `man errs, so long as he is > striving.' And all the mental effort of an assiduous > investigator must indeed appear vain and hopeless, if > he does not occasionally run across striking facts that > form incontrovertible proof of the truth he seeks, and > show him that after all he has moved at least one step > nearer to his objective." Max Planck. > Anyone who does not have tears in his eyes as he finishes reading > Planck's words has never sought Truth nor found a portion of it. and > will never understand my motives. Anyone who has, for inexplicable > reasons does. > ________________ > > glird True = the link between name and thing. Identity = compatibility between name and thing. "What is the world?" - This observation and description. A good description (model) is consistent with reality. It is clear and logical. Edward Robak* from Nowa Huta ~>°<~ Http://translate.google.com/ #
From: Sam Wormley on 27 Mar 2010 16:25 On 3/27/10 10:25 AM, glird wrote: > The thesis herein developed is that a continuum of substance fills > all space in the known cosmos... o has no measurable properties o is not detectable o doesn't exist
From: BURT on 27 Mar 2010 16:30 On Mar 27, 1:25 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/27/10 10:25 AM, glird wrote: > > > The thesis herein developed is that a continuum of substance fills > > all space in the known cosmos... > > o has no measurable properties > o is not detectable > o doesn't exist MAtter can move near light speed ahead or behind light in the space frame. Mitch Raemsch
From: Robakks on 27 Mar 2010 16:48
"BURT" <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> news:5a110792-a1b0-4073-80f7-ba5dac842d79(a)k5g2000pra.googlegroups.com... > On Mar 27, 1:25 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 3/27/10 10:25 AM, glird wrote: >> > The thesis herein developed is that a continuum of substance fills >> > all space in the known cosmos... >> o has no measurable properties >> o is not detectable >> o doesn't exist > MAtter can move near light speed ahead or behind light in the space > frame. > > Mitch Raemsch When a particle of matter exceeds the speed of light, it loses energy field and becomes a neutrino. Edward Robak* from Nowa Huta ~>�<~ http://translate.google.com/# |