Prev: What is Goedel's basic idea?
Next: WIMBLES WOBBLE BUT THEY DON'T FALL DOWN
From: glird on 27 Mar 2010 11:25
The following bit is from the introductory remarks of the that book.
______________

The thesis herein developed is that a continuum of substance fills
all space in the known cosmos; that this substance is an amorphous
fluid; that it is everywhere and always the conducting medium for
energies; that this material is subject to changes of volume hence is
intrinsically compressible; that pressure changes alter the degree of
compression of this material; that under the influence of such
pressure-density patterning, self persisting units of material occur;
and that such units, always contiguous either to each other or to
material in unorganized free form, are the things out of which
ponderable matter is made.
We shall find that the kinetic atomic theory (matter is made of
ultimate particles) got in the way of correct understanding of the
equations that describe and generalize experimental results and of the
physical experiments that helped refine those equations. As we study
the actions of a real material that has no voids anywhere, as compared
against the explanations based on a void space with particles
scattered about within it, you will gradually understand many things.
As you do you will see why the basic-particle theory is responsible
for the present belief that nature is ultimately incomprehensible to
Man, thus why mathematical equations have replaced comprehension as
the goal of theoretical physics. You will see why some of our deeply
embedded mental programs need to be changed and how incredibly hard it
is to do that. Along the way perhaps you may find some samples of the
fun and games Science can be.
...

Anyone and everyone makes mistakes. I do not fault the heroes who
made them nor claim any superior wisdom for having found them. Just
the opposite ... It is always easier to pore over the beaten trail
set down by others, to laboriously check their every step in search of
the slightest bimpy flaw, than it was to blaze the virgin trail
itself. I still remain that same observer, far back in the pack, who
started out so long ago one day to see what our scouts were up to as
they sought the Truth that would free us all. They still remain the
full-fledged heroes now, that they were to me before I began after
them.

I see the brick walls relativists see, but I know they are chimerical
holograms that only seem to block our way. In order to convince you of
that, so we can go on with the real story - the metaphysics and what
follows, it is necessary that the brain-washed reader be re-
programmed; that he no longer sees mythical walls that aren't there:
that he finally understands that matter truly exists and the world is
exactly as real as it appears to be to a normal person. Even though
there are details too small or large for him to hear or see or touch
or smell, there are no details he cannot understand.
That is where we are going.

We will not be attacking Einstein as we race along the many trails he
opened. Rather, the intent is to refine the course and clear the way
to those far horizons and open vistas my True Heroes always sought.
"... when I look back upon the long and torturous road
which finally led to [the quantum's] disclosure, this
development strikes me at times as a new illustration
of Goethe's saying, that `man errs, so long as he is
striving.' And all the mental effort of an assiduous
investigator must indeed appear vain and hopeless, if
he does not occasionally run across striking facts that
form incontrovertible proof of the truth he seeks, and
show him that after all he has moved at least one step
nearer to his objective." Max Planck.
Anyone who does not have tears in his eyes as he finishes reading
Planck’s words has never sought Truth nor found a portion of it. and
will never understand my motives. Anyone who has, for inexplicable
reasons does.
________________

glird
From: Robakks on 27 Mar 2010 14:09
"glird" <glird(a)aol.com>
news:4a6eff9e-531c-475d-9eac-a7f54e8d8cea(a)o30g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...

> The following bit is from the introductory remarks of the that book.
> ______________
>
> The thesis herein developed is that a continuum of substance fills
> all space in the known cosmos; that this substance is an amorphous
> fluid; that it is everywhere and always the conducting medium for
> energies; that this material is subject to changes of volume hence is
> intrinsically compressible; that pressure changes alter the degree of
> compression of this material; that under the influence of such
> pressure-density patterning, self persisting units of material occur;
> and that such units, always contiguous either to each other or to
> material in unorganized free form, are the things out of which
> ponderable matter is made.
> We shall find that the kinetic atomic theory (matter is made of
> ultimate particles) got in the way of correct understanding of the
> equations that describe and generalize experimental results and of the
> physical experiments that helped refine those equations. As we study
> the actions of a real material that has no voids anywhere, as compared
> against the explanations based on a void space with particles
> scattered about within it, you will gradually understand many things.
> As you do you will see why the basic-particle theory is responsible
> for the present belief that nature is ultimately incomprehensible to
> Man, thus why mathematical equations have replaced comprehension as
> the goal of theoretical physics. You will see why some of our deeply
> embedded mental programs need to be changed and how incredibly
> hard it is to do that. Along the way perhaps you may find some samples
> of the fun and games Science can be.
> ...
>
> Anyone and everyone makes mistakes. I do not fault the heroes who
> made them nor claim any superior wisdom for having found them. Just
> the opposite ... It is always easier to pore over the beaten trail
> set down by others, to laboriously check their every step in search of
> the slightest bimpy flaw, than it was to blaze the virgin trail
> itself. I still remain that same observer, far back in the pack, who
> started out so long ago one day to see what our scouts were up to as
> they sought the Truth that would free us all. They still remain the
> full-fledged heroes now, that they were to me before I began after
> them.
>
> I see the brick walls relativists see, but I know they are chimerical
> holograms that only seem to block our way. In order to convince you of
> that, so we can go on with the real story - the metaphysics and what
> follows, it is necessary that the brain-washed reader be re-
> programmed; that he no longer sees mythical walls that aren't there:
> that he finally understands that matter truly exists and the world is
> exactly as real as it appears to be to a normal person. Even though
> there are details too small or large for him to hear or see or touch
> or smell, there are no details he cannot understand.
> That is where we are going.
>
> We will not be attacking Einstein as we race along the many trails he
> opened. Rather, the intent is to refine the course and clear the way
> to those far horizons and open vistas my True Heroes always sought.
> "... when I look back upon the long and torturous road
> which finally led to [the quantum's] disclosure, this
> development strikes me at times as a new illustration
> of Goethe's saying, that `man errs, so long as he is
> striving.' And all the mental effort of an assiduous
> investigator must indeed appear vain and hopeless, if
> he does not occasionally run across striking facts that
> form incontrovertible proof of the truth he seeks, and
> show him that after all he has moved at least one step
> nearer to his objective." Max Planck.
> Anyone who does not have tears in his eyes as he finishes reading
> Planck's words has never sought Truth nor found a portion of it. and
> will never understand my motives. Anyone who has, for inexplicable
> reasons does.
> ________________
>
> glird


True = the link between name and thing.
Identity = compatibility between name and thing.
"What is the world?" - This observation and description.
A good description (model) is consistent with reality.
It is clear and logical.
Edward Robak* from Nowa Huta
~>°<~ Http://translate.google.com/ #

From: Sam Wormley on 27 Mar 2010 16:25
On 3/27/10 10:25 AM, glird wrote:
> The thesis herein developed is that a continuum of substance fills
> all space in the known cosmos...

o has no measurable properties
o is not detectable
o doesn't exist



From: BURT on 27 Mar 2010 16:30
On Mar 27, 1:25 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/27/10 10:25 AM, glird wrote:
>
> >    The thesis herein developed is that a continuum of substance fills
> > all space in the known cosmos...
>
>    o has no measurable properties
>    o is not detectable
>    o doesn't exist

MAtter can move near light speed ahead or behind light in the space
frame.

Mitch Raemsch
From: Robakks on 27 Mar 2010 16:48
"BURT" <macromitch(a)yahoo.com>
news:5a110792-a1b0-4073-80f7-ba5dac842d79(a)k5g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 27, 1:25 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 3/27/10 10:25 AM, glird wrote:

>> > The thesis herein developed is that a continuum of substance fills
>> > all space in the known cosmos...

>> o has no measurable properties
>> o is not detectable
>> o doesn't exist

> MAtter can move near light speed ahead or behind light in the space
> frame.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

When a particle of matter exceeds the speed of light,
it loses energy field
and becomes a neutrino.
Edward Robak* from Nowa Huta
~>�<~ http://translate.google.com/#

 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: What is Goedel's basic idea?
Next: WIMBLES WOBBLE BUT THEY DON'T FALL DOWN