Prev: Static g-fields
Next: DETAILS OF LIFE AFTER DEATH
From: BURT on 10 Dec 2009 23:11
On Dec 10, 7:57 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
> "Henry Wilson DSc." <HW@..> wrote in messagenews:qdf3i555m8ui2shvt3pk0ev4ref8vhjamc(a)4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:52:28 -0000, "Androcles"
> > <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_q>
> > wrote:
>
> >>"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW@..> wrote in message
> >>news:6i13i5pk6kn3nsqhmtq19l7bsh7tk9snej(a)4ax.com...
> >>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:53:37 -0000, "Androcles"
> >>> <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_q>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>>"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW@..> wrote in message
> >>>>news:gbr2i5lqqg29n1bap3ponp3rb5et638hha(a)4ax.com...
> >>>>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:39:41 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
> >>>>> <paul.b.ander...(a)somewhere.no> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>Henry Wilson DSc wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:53:47 -0800 (PST), xxein <xx...(a)comcast.net>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 5:09 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_q>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> "Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW@..> wrote in
> >>>>>>>>> messagenews:v8rqh5tp7pj3qvhfmdt64rdhrpb3r2miui(a)4ax.com...
>
> >>>>>>>>> When do we get to the "sensible" part?
> >>>>>>>> xxein:  You two never will.  You two have little knowledge of
> >>>>>>>> current
> >>>>>>>> physical theory and even less of the physic as it ultimately
> >>>>>>>> manifests
> >>>>>>>> itself.
>
> >>>>>>> Is that your best answer to my questions?
>
> >>>>>>Your question is meaningless.
> >>>>>>In a Newtonian world the gravitational force doesn't
> >>>>>>depend on the speed of the object, as you well know.
>
> >>>>> I know the possibility that it might has NOT been tested.
>
> >>>>>>In GR there is no such thing as "gravitational force"
> >>>>>>which can depend on velocity.
>
> >>>>> ...but we can ignore that kind of nonsense...even though Tom Roberts
> >>>>> once
> >>>>> assured me that the force DOES fall off slightly with speed according
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> GR.
>
> >>>>That settles it then. If Humpty Roberts said it then it has to be total
> >>>>bullshit.
>
> >>> But it's good to see two relativity 'experts' disagreeing.
>
> >>It's funny to see you citing Roberts to back your crackpot theory
> >>of swinging pendula.
>
> > The plain fact is, none of the EPG has the faintest idea what Einstein's
> > crackpot theory is all about anyway...so I might as well stir up some
> > internal
> > trouble....
>
> There is no trouble .. you can't even do that.  The one who can't understand
> relativity is you, as clearly evident from your crackpot nonsense claims
> about it.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Gravity strength does depend on the angle through the curve. For
instance a circular orbit has no gravity strength of acceleration. In
this case it drops to zero.

Mitch Raemsch
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Static g-fields
Next: DETAILS OF LIFE AFTER DEATH