Is MBAM is a 100% safe application?
in [Anti-Virus]
|
From: Peter Foldes on 12 May 2010 00:31 needless crossposting removed Jenn Do you have eyes and can you think clearly for you to be able to understand what is behind that picture.??? It is pornographic with the meaning of the written post that went along with it when it was posted -- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. http://www.microsoft.com/protect "Jenn" <nope(a)noway.atnohow.anyday> wrote in message news:hsd863$bai$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > James Morrow wrote: >> In article <hsaiis$t42$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, >> nope(a)noway.atnohow.anyday says... >>> >>> "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message >>> news:hsagh70t4j(a)news6.newsguy.com... >>>> From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk(a)earthling.net> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Apparently Jenn does not understand the meaning of the word >>>>> "vulgar." >>>> >>>>> http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=vulgar >>>> >>>> Everyone's caught up on the content. Is it vulgar ? Is it >>>> pornographic ? They are moot >>>> points and they don't matter. >>>> All that does matter is the Malwarebytes' AUP/ToS and BD violating >>>> the clause; "You agree >>>> not to post ... sexually-oriented..." >>>> >>>> http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?s=6eda7899360e71e75717e9d607179bef&act=boardrules >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> What do you mean by sexually-oriented? >>> >>> >> >> We are not discussing milk cows. Yes, this is sexually orientated. Any >> other conclusion is utterly unsupportable. > > Why is the image considered to be sexually oriented? > Also, why is the sigtag image the other poster on malwarebytes not considered to > be sexually oriented. They are very similar. > > -- > Jenn (from Oklahoma) >
From: James Egan on 12 May 2010 06:09 On Tue, 11 May 2010 14:12:29 -0400, "FromTheRafters" <erratic(a)nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> So if I wanted to express 0.5 as a vulgar fraction that would be >> "feckin' point five" > >5/10, 6/12, 233/466, then get the lowest vulgar denominator... > It was supposed to be a joke. Jim
From: Jenn on 12 May 2010 12:08 Max Wachtel wrote: > On Mon, 10 May 2010 21:55:33 -0400, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries >> >> Apparently Jenn does not understand the meaning of the word "vulgar." >> >> http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=vulgar >> > > one would think that living in the "bible belt" would cause one's > morals to be a little higher than those living in,let's say,Vegas? I'm also a Christian... what's that have to do with this image you are discussing? Define what you mean by "vulgar" or even "sexually oriented". Do you mean an image that turns people on? What do you mean because there are many images that could fall into either category but are not removed from groups that consider themselves to be family oriented. -- Jenn (from Oklahoma) http://pqlr.org/bbs/
From: Max Wachtel on 12 May 2010 20:19 On Wed, 12 May 2010 12:08:27 -0400, Jenn <me(a)nowhere.whocareswhatthisemailisanyway> wrote: > Max Wachtel wrote: >> On Mon, 10 May 2010 21:55:33 -0400, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries > >>> >>> Apparently Jenn does not understand the meaning of the word "vulgar." >>> >>> http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=vulgar >>> >> >> one would think that living in the "bible belt" would cause one's >> morals to be a little higher than those living in,let's say,Vegas? > > I'm also a Christian... what's that have to do with this image you are > discussing? > > Define what you mean by "vulgar" or even "sexually oriented". Do you > mean > an image that turns people on? What do you mean because there are many > images that could fall into either category but are not removed from > groups > that consider themselves to be family oriented. BD got himself banned for the image in question. Most of the forums I frequent would not have allowed it either. -- This post was created using Opera: http://www.opera.com Virus Removal Instructions http://sites.google.com/site/keepingwindowsclean/home Max's Favorite Freeware http://sites.google.com/site/keepingwindowsclean/freeware I am Max Wachtel and I approve this message.
From: Max Wachtel on 12 May 2010 22:51
On Tue, 11 May 2010 21:56:45 -0400, Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com> wrote: > That was 5 years ago I can't believe its been that long.... -- This post was created using Opera: http://www.opera.com Virus Removal Instructions http://sites.google.com/site/keepingwindowsclean/home Max's Favorite Freeware http://sites.google.com/site/keepingwindowsclean/freeware I am Max Wachtel and I approve this message. |