Is MBAM is a 100% safe application
in [Anti-Virus]
|
From: Poutnik on 30 Apr 2010 14:46 In article <#6nwZiI6KHA.5476(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>, maci252211 @hotmail.com says... > I would turn the OP's question : If I go to hospital, is it 100% safe, guaranting I will return alive and healthy ? If yes, then MBAM and any similar prog are 100% safe applications. If not, then they are not. -- Poutnik The best depends on how the best is defined.
From: FromTheRafters on 30 Apr 2010 19:11 "Poutnik" <me(a)privacy.net> wrote in message news:MPG.26454402d87e46c69898f2(a)127.0.0.1... > In article <#6nwZiI6KHA.5476(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>, maci252211 > @hotmail.com says... >> > I would turn the OP's question : > > If I go to hospital, is it 100% safe, > guaranting I will return alive and healthy ? If you go to the hospital, there is a good chance to get infected - considering all the sick people they allow in those places. Safer would be the local pub and 151 proof application. :o) > If yes, then MBAM and any similar prog are 100% safe applications. > > If not, then they are not. :o)
From: ~BD~ on 25 May 2010 13:06 "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)hotmail..co.uk> wrote in message news:j-ydnfsZGts7833WnZ2dnUVZ7rKdnZ2d(a)bt.com... | | I do so like your new signature block. | | May I ask why you are not using it at Annexcafe User2User to spread the | gospel to users there? | | Surely some members would benefit from exploring | http://www.microsoft.com/protect/ | | Or do you think otherwise? | | *Please* advise. | | -- | Dave Still awaiting your answer, Peter!
From: ~BD~ on 26 May 2010 18:02 "Bullwinkle" <BDTJ(a)loa.mo> wrote in message news:4bfd4f40$1(a)news.x-privat.org... | There are Jihad members posting here. | | What are you going to do about it?
From: ~BD~ on 26 May 2010 18:03
"Bullwinkle" <BDTJ(a)loa.mo> wrote in message news:4bfd4f40$1(a)news.x-privat.org... | There are Jihad members posting here. | | What are you going to do about it? |