From: Tom Lake on

"Nobody" <nobody(a)nobody.com> wrote in message
news:uITnbQvoKHA.4836(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> I don't have a 64 Bit Windows version installed. Does anyone know if
> Notepad that is included with Windows XP/Vista/2008/7 64-Bit editions is
> 32 or 64 Bits?

The Notepad that runs from the start menu is 64-bit.

Tom Lake

From: Tom on
Yes, but the file sizes are different. Not really anything to investigate, I
just find it interesting.

"Charlie Russel - MVP" <Charlie(a)mvKILLALLSPAMMERSps.org> wrote in message
news:#5y9iWBpKHA.1552(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Yes, the version numbers are the same, since they're driven by the build
> number.
>
> --
> Charlie.
> http://msmvps.com/blogs/russel
>
>
>
>
> "Tom" <noway(a)nothere.com> wrote in message
> news:O75Xay4oKHA.1548(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>
>>
>> "Charlie Russel - MVP" <Charlie(a)mvKILLALLSPAMMERSps.org> wrote in message
>> news:#hxbsRwoKHA.5508(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> Actually, no. The one in System32 is 64bit as well. But the one is
>>> \windows\SysWOW64 is 32-bit. All the programs in \windows\system32 on an
>>> x64 system should be 64-bit. Only the ones in SysWOW64 should be 32-bit.
>>> (yeah, right. I know that makes NO sense, but there it is.)
>>>
>>> Of course, if you use a 32-bit tool to look at the \windows\system32
>>> directory, all you'll actually see is the SysWOW64 directory,
>>> masquerading as the system32 directory.
>>
>> I noticed that as well when checking task manager. Interestingly, the
>> file versions numbers are exactly the same, despite the variances in the
>> sizes of those files.
>