From: MN on 25 Jun 2010 07:28 On 6/25/2010 3:51 AM, beijaflor wrote: > My friend says I should use Chrome but I think I should look at other > browsers. Is the Orca browser any good? > > http://www.orcabrowser.com/ > I tried it after your post and liked, specially because of its portable version, and especially since it works on Win2K. Pretty good on memory too, < 35MB with many loaded tabs, compared to 17.xMB for one instance of IE6, or a whopping 120MB by Opera. Gives you more screen space with the File menu moved cleverly onto the Title bar, with an extra button to minimize to tray. The tabs can be toggled to top/bottom. Comes with most features that current browsers have. And also doesn't support plug-ins like "Trend Protect" as with other browsers! The name ORCA is interesting, ACRO spelled backwards? Go ahead and try "Orca Browser USB Version" http://dl.filekicker.com/send/file/225040-TEOQ/orca.exe if you don't want to setup http://www.orcabrowser.com/release/osetup.exe -- / Mohan /
From: beija-flor on 25 Jun 2010 13:32 za kAT wrote: beija-flor wrote: >> You will also know that Opera can have a problem doing good >> copy/paste when forging/socking etc -- it produces a lot of those >> darned "=20" chars instead of CR/LF etc -- and using it thru some of >> those anonymous surfing sites to hide your IP. Many only recognise >> plain <128 ascii char sets. v9.80 suffers in particular <shrug> > >I didn't know that, Naturally, but that's what happens when you're a sloppy operator and fail to pay attention to what you're doing with Opera. >but I bow to your expertise in such matters. I've never used Opera :-) HTH beija-flor "You have been targeted for denigration"
From: za kAT on 25 Jun 2010 13:43 On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:32:03 +0200, beija-flor wrote: >>I didn't know that, > > Naturally, but that's what happens when you're a sloppy operator and > fail to pay attention to what you're doing with Opera. Astonishing admission hummingbird. Perhaps there's hope for you yet, now that you can publicly admit to your failings. -- zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - Sergeant Tech-Com, DN38416. Assigned to protect you. You've been targeted for denigration!
From: beijaflor on 25 Jun 2010 18:09 > On 6/25/2010 3:51 AM, beijaflor wrote: >> My friend says I should use Chrome but I think I should look >> at other browsers. Is the Orca browser any good? >> >> http://www.orcabrowser.com/ >> > > I tried it after your post and liked, specially because of > its portable version, and especially since it works on Win2K. > Pretty good on memory too, < 35MB with many loaded tabs, > compared to 17.xMB for one instance of IE6, or a whopping > 120MB by Opera. Gives you more screen space with the File > menu moved cleverly onto the Title bar, with an extra button > to minimize to tray. The tabs can be toggled to top/bottom. > Comes with most features that current browsers have. And > also doesn't support plug-ins like "Trend Protect" as with > other browsers! The name ORCA is interesting, ACRO spelled > backwards? > > Go ahead and try "Orca Browser USB Version" > http://dl.filekicker.com/send/file/225040-TEOQ/orca.exe if > you don't want to setup > http://www.orcabrowser.com/release/osetup.exe OK, I'm gonna try the USB version like you say. I'll make sure to tell my friend who likes Chrome because he also likes to write about portable freeware apps on his USB stick. -- beijaflor
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: If you're not part of the solution,you're the whole problem Next: [UPD] TBird 3.1 available |