Prev: Experience the insanity up close and personal-like
Next: Surjective Maps
From: Uncle Al on 17 Feb 2010 20:20
mike3 wrote:
>
> On Feb 17, 6:05 pm, tadchem <tadc...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> > On Feb 17, 12:38 pm, "2.7182818284590..." <tangent1...(a)gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I noticed that when I plot the numbers on a given row of Pascal's
> > > Triangle, the curve generated resembles the Bell Curve.
> >
> > > However, what distinguishes the Pascal's Triangle to the Normal
> > > Gaussian Distribution Curve is this: When I divide the biggest number
> > > (which is in the center of Pascal's Triangle) by the SUM of the entire
> > > row, this value seems to approach 0 the further down on the pyramid
> > > that I go. On the other hand, The Gaussian Distribution has a value
> > > of ~0.4 at x=0.
> >
> > > If the two are related, please explain how.
> >
> > Google "binomial distribution," "discrete distribution," "continuous
> > distribution," "Gaussian distribution," and then the names of all the
> > other distributions you stumble across - uniform, geometric,
> > multinomial, Poisson, hypergeometric, Pascal, gamma, exponential,
> > beta, chi-squared, Student's, and Snedecor's should keep you busy for
> > a while.
> >
>
> So all those things are needed to put together the complete theory of
> the relationship?

The "No Child Left Behind" alphabet has 23 letters - but not
consistently the same letters.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
From: mike3 on 22 Feb 2010 01:09
On Feb 17, 6:20 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote:
> mike3 wrote:
>
> > On Feb 17, 6:05 pm, tadchem <tadc...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> > > On Feb 17, 12:38 pm, "2.7182818284590..." <tangent1...(a)gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > I noticed that when I plot the numbers on a given row of Pascal's
> > > > Triangle, the curve generated resembles the Bell Curve.
>
> > > > However, what distinguishes the Pascal's Triangle to the Normal
> > > > Gaussian Distribution Curve is this:  When I divide the biggest number
> > > > (which is in the center of Pascal's Triangle) by the SUM of the entire
> > > > row, this value seems to approach 0 the further down on the pyramid
> > > > that I go.  On the other hand, The Gaussian Distribution has a value
> > > > of ~0.4 at x=0.
>
> > > > If the two are related, please explain how.
>
> > > Google "binomial distribution," "discrete distribution," "continuous
> > > distribution," "Gaussian distribution," and then the names of all the
> > > other distributions you stumble across - uniform, geometric,
> > > multinomial, Poisson, hypergeometric, Pascal, gamma, exponential,
> > > beta, chi-squared, Student's, and Snedecor's should keep you busy for
> > > a while.
>
> > So all those things are needed to put together the complete theory of
> > the relationship?
>
> The "No Child Left Behind" alphabet has 23 letters - but not
> consistently the same letters.
>

What's the "No Child Left Behind" *Alphabet*?
From: spudnik on 22 Feb 2010 13:09
NCLB/Come the Rapture; won't matter about Babel-on!

> What's the "No Child Left Behind" *Alphabet*?

thus:
vous etes tres pathetique, monsieur Valev. comme-ca,
quelle es problematique avec <<dilation doo temps>> --
faites-vous supposez, cette est le meme chose a journe' <<een>> temps?

> http://astronomy.ifrance.com/pages/gdes_theories/einstein.html
> "Le deuxième test classique donne en revanche des inquiétudes.
> Historiquement, pourtant, l'explication de l'avance du périhélie de
> Mercure, proposé par Einstein lui-même, donna ses lettres de noblesse
> à la relativité générale. Il s'agissait de comprendra pourquoi le
> périhélie de Mercure ( le point de son orbite le plus proche du
> soleil ) se déplaçait de 574 s d'arc par siècle. Certes, sur ces 574
> s, 531 s'expliquaient par les perturbations gravitationnels dues aux
> autres planètes. Mais restait 43 s, le fameux effet "périhélique "
> inexpliqué par les lois de Newton. Le calcul relativiste d'Einstein
> donna 42,98 s ! L'accord et si parfait qu'il ne laisse la place à
> aucune discussion. Or depuis 1966, le soleil est soupçonné ne pas être
> rigoureusement sphérique mais légèrement aplati à l'équateur. Une très
> légère dissymétries qui suffirait à faire avancer le périhélie de
> quelques secondes d'arc. Du coup, la preuve se transformerait en
> réfutation puisque les 42,88 s du calcul d'Einstein ne pourrait pas
> expliquer le mouvement réel de Mercure."
>
> http://astronomy.ifrance.com/pages/gdes_theories/einstein.html
> "Arthur Eddington , le premier en 1924, calculâtes théoriquement un
> décalage 0,007% attendu la surface de Sirius mais avec des données
> fausses à l'époque sur la masse et le rayon de l'étoile. L'année
> suivante, Walter Adams mesurerait exactement ces 0.007%. Il s'avère
> aujourd'hui que ces mesures , qui constituèrent pendant quarante ans
> une "preuves" de la relativité, étaient largement "arrangée" tant
> était grand le désir de vérifier la théorie d'Enstein. La véritable
> valeur fut mesurée en 1965. Elle est de 0.03% car Sirius est plus
> petite , et sont champ de gravitation est plus fort que ne le pensait
> Eddington."
> http://www.cieletespace.fr/evenement/relativit-les-preuves-taient-fau.......
>
> read more »

--les OEuvres!
http://wlym.com

--Stop Cheeny and Rice's 3rd British Invasion of Sudan!
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2010/100204rice-ists_sudan.html
From: Zdislav V. Kovarik on 24 Feb 2010 12:00


On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Uncle Al wrote:

> mike3 wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 17, 6:05 pm, tadchem <tadc...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> > > On Feb 17, 12:38 pm, "2.7182818284590..." <tangent1...(a)gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I noticed that when I plot the numbers on a given row of Pascal's
> > > > Triangle, the curve generated resembles the Bell Curve.
> > >
> > > > However, what distinguishes the Pascal's Triangle to the Normal
> > > > Gaussian Distribution Curve is this: When I divide the biggest number
> > > > (which is in the center of Pascal's Triangle) by the SUM of the entire
> > > > row, this value seems to approach 0 the further down on the pyramid
> > > > that I go. On the other hand, The Gaussian Distribution has a value
> > > > of ~0.4 at x=0.
> > >
> > > > If the two are related, please explain how.
> > >
> > > Google "binomial distribution," "discrete distribution," "continuous
> > > distribution," "Gaussian distribution," and then the names of all the
> > > other distributions you stumble across - uniform, geometric,
> > > multinomial, Poisson, hypergeometric, Pascal, gamma, exponential,
> > > beta, chi-squared, Student's, and Snedecor's should keep you busy for
> > > a while.
> > >
> >
> > So all those things are needed to put together the complete theory of
> > the relationship?
>
> The "No Child Left Behind" alphabet has 23 letters - but not
> consistently the same letters.
>

Another number fact: Knowing 21 out of 26 letters of the (English)
alphabet represents a score of over 80%, and that gives you a grade of A.

Cheers, ZVK(Slavek)

> --
> Uncle Al
> http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
> (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
> http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
>
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Experience the insanity up close and personal-like
Next: Surjective Maps