From: GTalbot on 24 Dec 2009 20:28 Hello fellow comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets colleagues, Suppose this rule: span {font: 32px caption;} According to you, is this CSS rule valid, legal? URL to test this: http://www.gtalbot.org/Stylesheets/font-shorthand-system-font-validator-bug..css Relevant spec: Section 15.8 states: " 'font' Value: [ [ <'font-style'> || <'font-variant'> || <'font- weight'> ]? <'font-size'> [ / <'line-height'> ]? <'font-family'> ] | caption | icon | menu | message-box | small-caption | status-bar | inherit (...) System fonts may only be set as a whole; that is, the font family, size, weight, style, etc. are all set at the same time. These values may then be altered individually if desired. " http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html#font-shorthand Section 1.4.2.1 states: " A bar (|) separates two or more alternatives: exactly one of them must occur. " http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/about.html#value-defs season's greetings, Gérard
From: C A Upsdell on 25 Dec 2009 02:14 GTalbot wrote: > Hello fellow comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets colleagues, > > Suppose this rule: > > span {font: 32px caption;} > > According to you, is this CSS rule valid, legal? > > URL to test this: > > http://www.gtalbot.org/Stylesheets/font-shorthand-system-font-validator-bug.css > > Relevant spec: > > Section 15.8 states: > " > 'font' > Value: [ [ <'font-style'> || <'font-variant'> || <'font- > weight'> ]? > <'font-size'> [ / <'line-height'> ]? <'font-family'> ] | caption | > icon | menu > | message-box | small-caption | status-bar | inherit > > (...) > > System fonts may only be set as a whole; that is, the font family, > size, > weight, style, etc. are all set at the same time. These values may > then be > altered individually if desired. > " > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html#font-shorthand > > Section 1.4.2.1 states: > " > A bar (|) separates two or more alternatives: exactly one of them must > occur. Could be ambiguous: a font named "caption" could exist, and how would the parser know whether the font or the keyword is intended? I am not a fan of sort-cut syntaxes which catenate a bunch or properties together: this can cause a problem for old browsers; and it makes it harder to forsee syntax errors.
From: GTalbot on 25 Dec 2009 08:05 On 25 déc, 02:14, C A Upsdell <cupsd...(a)nospam.not> wrote: > GTalbot wrote: > > Hello fellow comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheetscolleagues, > > > Suppose this rule: > > > span {font: 32px caption;} > > > According to you, is this CSS rule valid, legal? > > > URL to test this: > > >http://www.gtalbot.org/Stylesheets/font-shorthand-system-font-validat... > > > Relevant spec: > > > Section 15.8 states: > > " > > 'font' > > Value: [ [ <'font-style'> || <'font-variant'> || <'font- > > weight'> ]? > > <'font-size'> [ / <'line-height'> ]? <'font-family'> ] | caption | > > icon | menu > > | message-box | small-caption | status-bar | inherit > > > (...) > > > System fonts may only be set as a whole; that is, the font family, > > size, > > weight, style, etc. are all set at the same time. These values may > > then be > > altered individually if desired. > > " > >http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html#font-shorthand > > > Section 1.4.2.1 states: > > " > > A bar (|) separates two or more alternatives: exactly one of them must > > occur. > > Could be ambiguous: a font named "caption" could exist, and how would > the parser know whether the font or the keyword is intended? By quoting caption (and other system font reserved names). Just like it is done for ... " Font family names that happen to be the same as a keyword value ('inherit', 'serif', 'sans-serif', 'monospace', 'fantasy', and 'cursive') must be quoted to prevent confusion with the keywords with the same names. " http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html#font-family-prop season's greetings, Gérard
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Three-column css: Am I all wrong? Next: Scroll bar colors: good? bad? |