Prev: Crash/reboot at boot.
Next: OPEN A SECRET
From: Folderol on 30 Oct 2009 16:10 Or does anyone else think that many of the latest versions of common applications are much harder to use than before? kwrite krename k3b Are the first few that spring to mind :( -- Will J G
From: Simon J. Rowe on 30 Oct 2009 18:02 Folderol wrote: > Or does anyone else think that many of the latest versions of common > applications are much harder to use than before? > kwrite > krename > k3b > Are the first few that spring to mind :( No, amarok 2 is completely useless and almost unusable compared with 1.4. I can't say I've had any problems with k3b though. Simon
From: Neil Ellwood on 31 Oct 2009 05:27 On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:10:38 +0000, Folderol wrote: > Or does anyone else think that many of the latest versions of common > applications are much harder to use than before? kwrite > krename > k3b > Are the first few that spring to mind :( K3b certainly isn't harder to use than before. No experience of the other two - I don't use Kde. -- Neil Reverse 'r and a' Delete 'l'
From: Bruce Stephens on 31 Oct 2009 07:05 "Simon J. Rowe" <srowe(a)mose.org.uk> writes: [...] > No, amarok 2 is completely useless and almost unusable compared with > 1.4. I'm finding it adequate, but I don't use it much. It seems to have lost a feature, in that I don't seem to be able to copy a playlist to my MTP device (which certainly supports playlists, and 1.4 was happy to create them).
From: Bruce Stephens on 31 Oct 2009 07:06
Folderol <folderol(a)ukfsn.org> writes: > Or does anyone else think that many of the latest versions of common > applications are much harder to use than before? > kwrite > krename > k3b > Are the first few that spring to mind :( Emacs 23 is better than its predecessors, for what it's worth. |