From: Murugesan on
Actually i need to port specific layers of drivers from linux to windows. As
from the windows kernel point of view, my modules will be just KMDF
function/bus drivers. I hope KMDF supports func/bus driver approach as in WDM
& has good documentation on child PDO handling, maintaining bus driver
protocols.

Murugesan

"eagersh" wrote:

> On Sep 12, 3:50 am, Murugesan <Muruge...(a)discussions.microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> > Thanks again Tim. Which model will provide good & stabilized driver for
> > Function/Bus driver approach, WDM or WDF ? Are latest microsoft drivers are
> > developed in WDF ?
> A lot of drivers develop could be developed by using WDF but not all,
> compare to WDM. You need to check documentation on WDF which type of
> drivers it supports now. And WDF adds new type drivers in every
> release of WDK. It is good technology. If you need develop a new stuff
> from scratch and such type of driver supported by WDF you definitely
> should choose WDF. In this case, you would keep your time for
> developing and debugging.
>
> Igor Sharovar
>
From: Maxim S. Shatskih on
> function/bus drivers. I hope KMDF supports func/bus driver approach as in WDM
> & has good documentation on child PDO handling

Yes and yes. KMDF is very good for bus drivers.

--
Maxim S. Shatskih
Windows DDK MVP
maxim(a)storagecraft.com
http://www.storagecraft.com

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: dsfksvcs.sys missing or corrupt
Next: Virtual Printer