From: njem on 26 Mar 2010 20:09 Interesting approaches. I'll check them out. Thanks. On Mar 26, 1:05 pm, Anteaus <Ante...(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > As an additional (or alternative) protection you might like to look at: > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/softwarepolicy > > There is also the option of running the most vulnerable apps such as > browsers as a limited user: > > http://www.sysint.no/nedlasting/StripMyRights.htm >
From: Leythos on 27 Mar 2010 22:22 In article <6727531B-2CBF-4502-B7B9-A9CF8BA2F0F4(a)microsoft.com>, Anteaus(a)discussions.microsoft.com says... > IMLI, non-admin works for sites that have onsite IT staff to handle updates, > etc. For other sites it is too problematic. > My mother in-law has been living with the LOCAL USER, LOCAL ADMIN dual accounts method for more than 6 years and it's not caused her any difficulty. When she first got her computer her son (30+) installed it and it was hacked the same day, she learned from that, and she's followed my methods since - and she's only been compromised once since that time, when her granddaughter (same son's daughter) installed P2P software as the admin account and started downloading pirated works.... Fixed that and she's even been able to run QuickBooks as a local user.... -- You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that. Trust yourself. spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Task Cheduler Access is denied Next: Secure connection betwen server and Windows XP |