Is python not good enough?
in [Python]
|
From: Aahz on 12 Jan 2010 18:55 In article <1b42700d-139a-4653-8669-d4ee2fc488b6(a)r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, ikuta liu <ikuta85(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >Is python not good enough? for google, enhance python performance is >the good way better then choose build Go language? It is not at all clear that -- despite some comments to the contrary -- the Go developers are intending to compete with Python. Go seems much more intended to compete with C++/Java. If they're successful, we may eventually see GoPython. ;-) -- Aahz (aahz(a)pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." --Red Adair
From: johan.sanden on 13 Jan 2010 03:53 On Jan 13, 12:55 am, a...(a)pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote: > In article <1b42700d-139a-4653-8669-d4ee2fc48...(a)r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, > ikuta liu <ikut...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >Is python not good enough? for google, enhance python performance is > >the good way better then choose build Go language? > > It is not at all clear that -- despite some comments to the contrary -- > the Go developers are intending to compete with Python. Go seems much > more intended to compete with C++/Java. If they're successful, we may > eventually see GoPython. ;-) > -- > Aahz (a...(a)pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ > > "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait > until you hire an amateur." --Red Adair GoPython i think would be neat.
From: tanix on 13 Jan 2010 04:06 In article <53ec94c0-dbdd-4901-a46b-d7faee121e1a(a)j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, "johan.sanden(a)gmail.com" <johan.sanden(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Jan 13, 12:55=A0am, a...(a)pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote: >> In article <1b42700d-139a-4653-8669-d4ee2fc48...(a)r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.= >com>, >> ikuta liu =A0<ikut...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >Is python not good enough? for google, enhance python performance is >> >the good way better then choose build Go language? >> >> It is not at all clear that -- despite some comments to the contrary -- >> the Go developers are intending to compete with Python. =A0Go seems much >> more intended to compete with C++/Java. =A0If they're successful, we may >> eventually see GoPython. =A0;-) >> -- >> Aahz (a...(a)pythoncraft.com) =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <*> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http:/= >/www.pythoncraft.com/ >> >> "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait >> until you hire an amateur." =A0--Red Adair > >GoPython i think would be neat. Well, as soon as they restore the braces to identify the code blocks and provide the functionality of advanced statically type languages, such as threads, async processing, all synchronization primitives, garbage collection, events and GUI, i'd be willing to switch to Python. Some of it is already there. But not all. Except, before doing it, I'd like to know what Python buys me compared to say Java. -- Programmer's Goldmine collections: http://preciseinfo.org Tens of thousands of code examples and expert discussions on C++, MFC, VC, ATL, STL, templates, Java, Python, Javascript, PHP, organized by major topics of language, tools, methods, techniques.
From: Chris Rebert on 13 Jan 2010 04:18 On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:06 AM, tanix <tanix(a)mongo.net> wrote: > In article <53ec94c0-dbdd-4901-a46b-d7faee121e1a(a)j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, "johan.sanden(a)gmail.com" <johan.sanden(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>On Jan 13, 12:55=A0am, a...(a)pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote: >>> In article <1b42700d-139a-4653-8669-d4ee2fc48...(a)r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.= >>com>, >>> ikuta liu =A0<ikut...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >Is python not good enough? for google, enhance python performance is >>> >the good way better then choose build Go language? >>> >>> It is not at all clear that -- despite some comments to the contrary -- >>> the Go developers are intending to compete with Python. =A0Go seems much >>> more intended to compete with C++/Java. =A0If they're successful, we may >>> eventually see GoPython. =A0;-) >>> -- >>> Aahz (a...(a)pythoncraft.com) =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <*> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http:/= >>/www.pythoncraft.com/ >>> >>> "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait >>> until you hire an amateur." =A0--Red Adair >> >>GoPython i think would be neat. > > Well, as soon as they restore the braces to identify the code > blocks and provide the functionality of advanced statically > type languages, such as threads, async processing, all synchronization > primitives, garbage collection, events and GUI, i'd be willing > to switch to Python. Some of it is already there. But not all. > > Except, before doing it, I'd like to know what Python buys me > compared to say Java. The lack of knowledge shown here gives me even less confidence in your "Goldmine" collections than before. Cheers, Chris -- http://blog.rebertia.com > -- > Programmer's Goldmine collections: > > http://preciseinfo.org > > Tens of thousands of code examples and expert discussions on > C++, MFC, VC, ATL, STL, templates, Java, Python, Javascript, PHP, > organized by major topics of language, tools, methods, techniques.
From: Stefan Behnel on 13 Jan 2010 04:21
tanix, 13.01.2010 10:06: > Well, as soon as they restore the braces to identify the code > blocks and provide the functionality of advanced statically > type languages, such as threads, async processing, all synchronization > primitives, garbage collection, events and GUI, i'd be willing > to switch to Python. Some of it is already there. But not all. Why don't you write up a proposal for the python-ideas list? Stefan |