From: dergal on
On 30 May, 13:38, Andy Dingley <ding...(a)codesmiths.com> wrote:
> On 30 May, 11:45, ship <ship...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > One of our staff has already been coding HTML by hand (using a text
> > editor) and it's VERY time consuming.
>
> Then they should code simpler HTML. If the markup is simplified to the
> bare semantics of your email, you can boilerplate the beginnings of
> the new message, and you've a simple embedded CSS that handles the
> rest of the formatting, then this really is (as it should be) a quick
> hand-coding exercise.

1. DW doesn't do bad code - it produces code that can be cleaned up /
optimised etc.. it does it fast and easily ... I produce bad code,
with DWs help!

2. As a cheap / Free alternative to DW I would suggest you actually
look at Microsoft - they had a free bit of software that seemed quite
good, and able to do a reasonable job ( I forgot the name) not sure
its still free, it was during beta at least)

3. Handcoding is something all web developers should learn, as tools
(not even DW) struggle with the finesse of streamlining code to look
and do exactly what you want (without resorting to layout tables
etc... )

4. Response rates on well presented HTML emails can be substantially
higher than in plain text - DEPENDING on what you are selling of
course - if its something that an image sells... its more effective.
This is based on a few large email sends. Personally, I get about two
or three emails from shops I had previoulsy been customers of - and I
prefer them in HTML.


HTH's

Gerry White

http://www.FinanceExtra.net





From: ship on
On May 30, 11:06 am, Andy Dingley <ding...(a)codesmiths.com> wrote:
> On 30 May, 10:34, ship <ship...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I have potentially two members of staff that I need to get to write
> > very simple
> > HTML emails for sending to our (quite large) list of customers.
>
> Then teach them some HTML and have them use a text editor. They'll
> also find this to be much quicker to use.

No, with all due respect this is b*ll*cks.
We already have tought them *some* HTML but the quickest way to learn
is to give them a well-behaved WYSIWYG editor like Dreamweaver!

It also save a huge amount of time for doing stuff like building
tables.

Can you suggest any cheap/cut-down alternatives to Dreamweaver?

> DW is not only expensive, it writes bad web pages and it writes
> terrible HTML emails (mainly because they're so bloated)
Not particularly. In any case production speed is more important than
purist arguments about compact code.

> Good books to read would be "Head First HTML" or Lie & Bos' "Cascading
> Style Sheets"
Thanks


Ship
Shiperton Henethe

From: Tom J on
ship wrote:
> On May 30, 11:06 am, Andy Dingley <ding...(a)codesmiths.com> wrote:
>> On 30 May, 10:34, ship <ship...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I have potentially two members of staff that I need to get to
>>> write
>>> very simple
>>> HTML emails for sending to our (quite large) list of customers.
>>
>> Then teach them some HTML and have them use a text editor. They'll
>> also find this to be much quicker to use.
>
> No, with all due respect this is b*ll*cks.
> We already have tought them *some* HTML but the quickest way to
> learn
> is to give them a well-behaved WYSIWYG editor like Dreamweaver!
>
> It also save a huge amount of time for doing stuff like building
> tables.
>
> Can you suggest any cheap/cut-down alternatives to Dreamweaver?

http://nvu.com/index.php
"Finally! A complete Web Authoring System for Linux desktop users as
well as Microsoft Windows and Macintosh users to rival programs like
FrontPage and Dreamweaver."

Based on Mozilla Sea Monkey composer and about as inexpensive as you
can get - free.

Tom J


From: ship on
> http://nvu.com/index.php
> "Finally! A complete Web Authoring System for Linux desktop users as
> well as Microsoft Windows and Macintosh users to rival programs like
> FrontPage and Dreamweaver."
>
> Based on Mozilla Sea Monkey composer and about as inexpensive as you
> can get - free.

Yes, but is there anything similar for WindowsXP?

What do other companies use for novice users?

We love the simple interface that Dreamweaver has, but it's stupidly
expensive
to use on our novice users who simply need to write some basic email
letters
in HTML.

BUT the only version of Dreamweaver that I can see on www.adobe.com
seems to be
"Adobe Dreamweaver CS3" which costs a full: £393.62 !! (here in the
UK)

Surely there is a cheaper, cut-down version ??
Or should we just buy a SECOND HAND, out-of-date version of
Dreamweaver
(e.g. Dreamweaver MX etc) - e.g. off ebay...

- Any thoughts?



Ship
Shiperton Henethe

P.S. In time we may well need and want our novice users to migrate up
to
a full version of Dreamweaver... but we need something sensibly priced
to get them
going...



From: Red E. Kilowatt on
ship <shiphen(a)gmail.com> wrote in message:
1183626249.765146.102940(a)m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com,

>> http://nvu.com/index.php
>> "Finally! A complete Web Authoring System for Linux desktop users as
>> well as Microsoft Windows and Macintosh users to rival programs like
>> FrontPage and Dreamweaver."
>>
>> Based on Mozilla Sea Monkey composer and about as inexpensive as you
>> can get - free.
>
> Yes, but is there anything similar for WindowsXP?
>
> What do other companies use for novice users?
>
> We love the simple interface that Dreamweaver has, but it's stupidly
> expensive
> to use on our novice users who simply need to write some basic email
> letters
> in HTML.
>
> BUT the only version of Dreamweaver that I can see on www.adobe.com
> seems to be
> "Adobe Dreamweaver CS3" which costs a full: �393.62 !! (here in the
> UK)
>
> Surely there is a cheaper, cut-down version ??
> Or should we just buy a SECOND HAND, out-of-date version of
> Dreamweaver
> (e.g. Dreamweaver MX etc) - e.g. off ebay...
>
> - Any thoughts?
>
>
>
> Ship
> Shiperton Henethe
>
> P.S. In time we may well need and want our novice users to migrate up
> to
> a full version of Dreamweaver... but we need something sensibly priced
> to get them
> going...

Do a Google search on "Dreamweaver OEM"

I saw this one for $129
http://www.gizmos2go.com/product.php?productid=5435&MMCF

Of course this may not be 100% legal according to the Macromedia license
agreements for it's OEM products, but as long as the vendor guarantees
that Macromedia will accept the product registration, then I see no
problem with buying it.

--
Red