Prev: MiniDumpWriteDump fails with error 0x8007012B (Only part of a ReadProcessMemory or WriteProcessMemory request was completed.)
Next: writefile(..) ERROR number =5 = Access is Denied, when writing to USB sector 0
From: Alexander Grigoriev on 6 Jul 2008 22:58 "Alan Carre" <alan(a)twilightgames.com> wrote in message news:u3jWMqx3IHA.1200(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > Also, preemptively, I would like to point out, that there's absolutely NO > speed increase booting up via. un-hybernate as everyone should know. It's > *not* about speed. The advantage of un-hybernalte is entirely in the fact > that you can resume whatever it was you were doing at the time of > shutdown. And *that* is no small time-saver. Sometimes I have dozens of > apps open and in the middle of editing documents in all of them (code, > data, images, config files, database files, registry settings, etc etc > etc) and somehow I'm supposed to remember all that and pick up where I > left off ?!?!? Plus, even if I *could* remember where I was, I lose my > undo/redo histories in every app. So it's impossible really, to get back > to the original spot where you left off. > > But not with Hybernate(TM)! ;) > I dunno, for me return from hibernate takes like 5 seconds or so... Complete boot is not so fast, even to the logon screen; then logon script and all the enterprise crapware starting...
From: Gary G. Little on 7 Jul 2008 11:27 Silly thought, but it would seem that as cheap as HDDs are, you could have purchased a 750 GB internal drive, cloned your current system drive to it, and no longer be fenced in. And done all of that for what it has cost to tell us why you "can't". -- The personal opinion of Gary G. Little "Alan Carre" <alan(a)twilightgames.com> wrote in message news:u3jWMqx3IHA.1200(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > "Kerem G�mr�kc�" <kareem114(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:uYgKieO2IHA.3884(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > >> So my question is not abozt making the system faster by >> moving hiberfil.sys to some other place, because in fact >> it wont make anything faster, but the question is more about >> whether this is possible or not. > > Is anyone going to answer this question? I also would like to know if it > is possible. > > And boy would I would LOVE to turn on the hybernate feature! Unfortunately > there's not enough space left on my boot partition (Ok, well there is, but > *just barely*. hyberfile.sys would be 2Gigs on this machine unless i yank > out my RAM - [which I refuse to do] leaving me with a piddly couple > hundred megs. Which, strangely, seems to be the approximate magnitude of > "free-space fluctuations" that occur regularly). > > Also, preemptively, I would like to point out, that there's absolutely NO > speed increase booting up via. un-hybernate as everyone should know. It's > *not* about speed. The advantage of un-hybernalte is entirely in the fact > that you can resume whatever it was you were doing at the time of > shutdown. And *that* is no small time-saver. Sometimes I have dozens of > apps open and in the middle of editing documents in all of them (code, > data, images, config files, database files, registry settings, etc etc > etc) and somehow I'm supposed to remember all that and pick up where I > left off ?!?!? Plus, even if I *could* remember where I was, I lose my > undo/redo histories in every app. So it's impossible really, to get back > to the original spot where you left off. > > But not with Hybernate(TM)! ;) > > - Alan Carre > > P.S. BTW: I have consistent power failures out here in the boon-docks... > so it's not like I can just leave the machine on (in case someone were to > suggest that as a *solution*). > > P.P.S. Kerem: "Swap file to USB" Wow! Who would've thought? You're a > f&*%ing Genius! I wonder though... would a RAM drive really work (as > someone "jokingly" suggested)? That would be even faster (and especially > for me with 2Gigs available. You see, unfortunately XP is too stupid to > realize that there's enough physical memory available to accomidate all > tasks and instead decides to map otherwise available RAM addresses to some > clumsy machine with gears and servo motors and little disks whizzing > around. Great for long-term storage, but for real-time use? You know, I > just don't get it...). > > >
From: Alan Carre on 7 Jul 2008 11:49 "Pavel A." <pavel_a(a)NOwritemeNO.com> wrote in message news:OpNtK463IHA.3500(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Ugm. 2.5 GB is too little for the system drive. > However... using directory junctions can help to move stuff > away from the system partition, while it still logically remains > part of it's directory tree. It's not a 2.5Gig partition, it's a 10Gig partition (which is also quite small I admit). 2.5Gig was what was remaining (without hyberfile.sys). - Alan Carre
From: Alan Carre on 7 Jul 2008 11:51 "David Craig" <drivers(a)nowhere.us> wrote in message news:OeLY2B73IHA.1436(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Is there something that says you have to use the current hard drive with > the partitions as they currently exist? > > What is wrong with Partition Magic? New hard drive? Both? Please do tell! I know such a thing existed for DOS but I didn't know there was an NT/NTFS version. I'd be glad to double the size of my system partition (I have more than enough space on the other partition). Thanks! I'm googling it now. - Alan Carre
From: Alan Carre on 7 Jul 2008 12:01
"David Craig" <drivers(a)nowhere.us> wrote in message news:OeLY2B73IHA.1436(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Is there something that says you have to use the current hard drive with > the partitions as they currently exist? > > What is wrong with Partition Magic? New hard drive? Both? Correction: I knew there was a DOS version *that can repartition an NTFS Hard Drive* but you still needed to boot into DOS to run it. I knew that because that's exactly how these partitions were created in the first place. I didn't do it myself though... someone at the shop happened to have a copy on a bootable CD-ROM (my other HD had failed, which used to be the system drive - now just a backup/"mirror" drive). - Alan Carre |