From: Steve Hix on
In article <dog_cow-1270232416(a)macgui.com>,
dog_cow(a)macgui.com (D Finnigan) wrote:

> Robert Montgomery wrote:
> > Is there still a good, free file compression program?
> >
>
> bzip2
> gzip

Both ship with OS X, available through Terminal.app.
From: Jeffrey Goldberg on
Paul Sture wrote:

> (Having said that, I've just started using rsync to backup changes and
> that is faster still.

rsync is great. I use it everywhere I can. I also use it for my
backups on FreeBSD via sysutils/rsnapshot in ports. It makes use of an
often overlooked feature of rsync, --link-dest. This makes it possible
to have Time Machine like back-ups using rsync.

> It also gets around incompatibilities between
> FreeBSD tar and the GNU tar which comes with OS X)

There is that. But I'm sure you know about archivers/gtar.

Cheers,

-j

--
Jeffrey Goldberg http://goldmark.org/jeff/
I rarely read HTML or poorly quoting posts
Reply-To address is valid
From: Walter Bushell on
In article <81kfdtFcptU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
Jeffrey Goldberg <nobody(a)goldmark.org> wrote:

> Robert Montgomery wrote:
>
> > I think "Create Archive" wasn't effective
> > enough for my project today because it my 13.5 meg files by only about
> > 20 percent.
>
> One limitation of zip-like archivers is that they compress the
> individual files first and then put them into an archive. If there is
> redundancy between files, you get much better compression if you create
> an archive of uncompressed files and then compress that archive.
>
> This is way I prefer things like .tar.gz or .tar.bz2.
>
> I'll bet someone has written a tool to do that from a Finder contextual
> menu instead of having to learn command-line tools, but I've never
> looked for it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -j

Disadvantage is that in the first method damage to any file does not
necessarily ruin the entire package while the second will.

--
A computer without Microsoft is like a chocolate cake without mustard.
From: M-M on
In article <Pu6tn.608$z%6.282(a)edtnps83>,
Robert Montgomery <info-block(a)northern-data-tech.net> wrote:

> I think "Create Archive" wasn't effective
> enough for my project today because it my 13.5 meg files by only about
> 20 percent.


It depends on what you are trying to compress. JPG and many movie files
are already compressed and will not show much difference.

--
m-m
http://www.mhmyers.com
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Prev: I miss Classic
Next: Print to pdf broken ?