Is this Regular Expression for UTF-8 Correct??
in [MFC]
|
From: Hector Santos on 19 May 2010 13:50 On May 19, 1:09 pm, "Pete Delgado" <Peter.Delg...(a)NoSpam.com> wrote: > "Peter Olcott" <NoS...(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message > >> I just posted the complete detailed design of the UTF-8 recognizer. The >> code will follow within a week. The only thing that needs to be added to >> this design is the actual code the does the translation from UTF-8 to >> UTF-32. > > I'll be happy to look for the code on the 27th! > > -Pete Maybe we can start a sucker's bet here? :) I got $50 bucks on NEVER producing anything representing his claims. -- HLS
From: Peter Olcott on 19 May 2010 14:16 On 5/19/2010 12:50 PM, Hector Santos wrote: > On May 19, 1:09 pm, "Pete Delgado"<Peter.Delg...(a)NoSpam.com> wrote: >> "Peter Olcott"<NoS...(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message >> >>> I just posted the complete detailed design of the UTF-8 recognizer. The >>> code will follow within a week. The only thing that needs to be added to >>> this design is the actual code the does the translation from UTF-8 to >>> UTF-32. >> >> I'll be happy to look for the code on the 27th! >> >> -Pete > > Maybe we can start a sucker's bet here? :) > > I got $50 bucks on NEVER producing anything representing his claims. > > -- > HLS You owe me fifty bucks Hector, I just posted the results of my working prototype that implements my patent claims.
From: Hector Santos on 19 May 2010 15:01 On May 19, 2:16 pm, Peter Olcott <NoS...(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote: > On 5/19/2010 12:50 PM, Hector Santos wrote: > > > > > On May 19, 1:09 pm, "Pete Delgado"<Peter.Delg...(a)NoSpam.com> wrote: > >> "Peter Olcott"<NoS...(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message > > >>> I just posted the complete detailed design of the UTF-8 recognizer. The > >>> code will follow within a week. The only thing that needs to be added to > >>> this design is the actual code the does the translation from UTF-8 to > >>> UTF-32. > > >> I'll be happy to look for the code on the 27th! > > >> -Pete > > > Maybe we can start a sucker's bet here? :) > > > I got $50 bucks on NEVER producing anything representing his claims. > > > -- > > HLS > > You owe me fifty bucks Hector, I just posted the results of my working > prototype that implements my patent claims. Where? I don't see any code? But there you go, you once again PROVED and SHOWED that this is all about a lame, nefarious and unethical attempt to get your patent claims disproved or substantiated which already has been shown in the last 4 years to be of NO VALUE to anyone but yourself. One has to ask, how were you even able to produce a patent without any working example in the first place or code to begin with? It was all in your mind. People, don't feed this Patent Troll any more ideas -- HLS
From: Peter Olcott on 19 May 2010 15:17 On 5/19/2010 2:01 PM, Hector Santos wrote: > On May 19, 2:16 pm, Peter Olcott<NoS...(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote: >> On 5/19/2010 12:50 PM, Hector Santos wrote: >> >> >> >>> On May 19, 1:09 pm, "Pete Delgado"<Peter.Delg...(a)NoSpam.com> wrote: >>>> "Peter Olcott"<NoS...(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message >> >>>>> I just posted the complete detailed design of the UTF-8 recognizer. The >>>>> code will follow within a week. The only thing that needs to be added to >>>>> this design is the actual code the does the translation from UTF-8 to >>>>> UTF-32. >> >>>> I'll be happy to look for the code on the 27th! >> >>>> -Pete >> >>> Maybe we can start a sucker's bet here? :) >> >>> I got $50 bucks on NEVER producing anything representing his claims. >> >>> -- >>> HLS >> >> You owe me fifty bucks Hector, I just posted the results of my working >> prototype that implements my patent claims. > > Where? I don't see any code? http://www.ocr4screen.com/Unique.html You don't get to see the code, that is proprietary. Even if the results on this link are faked (they are not) it still is something that I produced that represents my claims. > > But there you go, you once again PROVED and SHOWED that this is all > about a lame, nefarious and unethical attempt to get your patent > claims disproved or substantiated which already has been shown in the > last 4 years to be of NO VALUE to anyone but yourself. One has to > ask, how were you even able to produce a patent without any working > example in the first place or code to begin with? It was all in your > mind. > > People, don't feed this Patent Troll any more ideas > > -- > HLS
From: Joseph M. Newcomer on 19 May 2010 15:25
Nigel did a presentation of his work to our group, and pointed out that both lexing and parsing performance were improved by generating code. His paper concentrates on the more complex problem of parsing. joe On Wed, 19 May 2010 10:47:50 -0500, Peter Olcott <NoSpam(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote: >On 5/19/2010 10:29 AM, Joseph M. Newcomer wrote: >> Actually, I state *opinions* that nobody has to accept. >> joe >> >> On Tue, 18 May 2010 22:34:59 -0700, "Mihai N."<nmihai_year_2000(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> >>>> I can't accept this without direct proof. >>> >>> Yet, we are all supposed to take everything *you* >>> say without any proof. >> Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP] >> email: newcomer(a)flounder.com >> Web: http://www.flounder.com >> MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm > >The evidence that you provided to show that a faster alternative existed >to a state transition matrix based lexer did no lexing only parsing. The >title of the paper pertained to parsing, not lexing. Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP] email: newcomer(a)flounder.com Web: http://www.flounder.com MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm |