Prev: integer type returned by size
Next: Diazepam shipped overnight without a prescription, buy Diazepam online next day delivery
From: Paul Thomas on 23 Mar 2010 12:56 On Mar 23, 5:35 pm, Salvatore <sfilipp...(a)uniroma2.it> wrote: > I think it is valid, because I can see no reason why an additional USE > layer should change the compliance... The gfortran testsuite has recent testcases that are structured just like that to test generic association via different routes (and one or your OOP problems?). I forget which testcases they are. Paul
From: Salvatore on 23 Mar 2010 13:16
On 23 Mar, 17:56, Paul Thomas <paul.richard.tho...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 23, 5:35 pm, Salvatore <sfilipp...(a)uniroma2.it> wrote: > > > I think it is valid, because I can see no reason why an additional USE > > layer should change the compliance... > > The gfortran testsuite has recent testcases that are structured just > like that to test generic association via different routes (and one or > your OOP problems?). I forget which testcases they are. > > Paul I also opened another bug (not sure if it's a duplicate) involving GENERICs Salvatore |