It's not science, it's sci.
in [Cryptography]
|
From: adacrypt on 2 Feb 2010 07:08 On Feb 2, 11:46 am, Noob <r...(a)127.0.0.1> wrote: > adacrypt wrote: > > Congratulations mate - Iv'e been saying it for years - there are none > > as blind as those who do not want to see - suggest you read my most > > recent web upload - to http:/'/www.scalarcryptography.co.uk-it's > > called "A Disordering Principle in Cryptography" - not all of it is in > > your context but is related in part. - Cheers adacrypt > > > Come to think of it - 'sci' is just as pseudo to science as current > > cryptography is to the real thing - adacrypt > > Your crackpot index(*) is through the roof. > > Are you aiming for JSH's crown? > > (*)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crackpot_index One thing is certain sure and that is that the veracity of mathematical proof will never be dumbed down - wikipedia.org is maintained by enthusiastic amateurs and is useful as a usually fairly good starting reference but there is no way that it can be compared with mathematics. "Queen of the Arts - King of the Sciences" has been said about mathematics which may I point out is superior even to science which is prone to change with time and is fallible. If we are all honest we would have to admit that current cryptography is living on borrowed time and count-down could start almost any of these days. Giving partisan support to such a shaky staus quo is fooling oneself - the US government knows this but until they call time then the 'nice little earner' that the current soft peripheral crypto industry is, will go on - its time to get real and get honest - slagging me or anyone else off does't change the underlying truth - adacrypt
From: david.florman on 2 Feb 2010 11:40 On Feb 2, 6:46 am, Noob <r...(a)127.0.0.1> wrote: > adacrypt wrote: > > Congratulations mate - Iv'e been saying it for years - there are none > > as blind as those who do not want to see - suggest you read my most > > recent web upload - to http:/'/www.scalarcryptography.co.uk-it's > > called "A Disordering Principle in Cryptography" - not all of it is in > > your context but is related in part. - Cheers adacrypt > > > Come to think of it - 'sci' is just as pseudo to science as current > > cryptography is to the real thing - adacrypt > > Your crackpot index(*) is through the roof. > > Are you aiming for JSH's crown? > > (*)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crackpot_index
From: J.D. on 2 Feb 2010 14:23
> > Science is an attempt to arrive at, or at least sidle closer to > > truth by asking questions and getting answers. Here at sci.corrupt, > > there is no need for truth to interfere with a perfectly good, revenue > > generating falsehood. This is easily represented by the Bamboozler > > Kruh and his Beale cipher papers. They have been allowed to remain, > > attached to his name and reputation, as a supposedly worthwhile > > opinion when in fact they are utterly incorrect and misleading. Kruh > > knows this. He chooses to remain silent. I would not find it > > surprising if, in his circle, greatness is measured by the number of > > those you deceive. > > Congratulations mate - Iv'e been saying it for years - there are none > as blind as those who do not want to see - suggest you read my most > recent web upload - to http:/'/www.scalarcryptography.co.uk-it's > called "A Disordering Principle in Cryptography" - not all of it is in > your context but is related in part. - Cheers adacrypt Tonight on Fox..."When Clown Cars Collide". |