From: Tom Anderson on 17 Apr 2010 07:50 On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, Abu Yahya wrote: > Roedy Green wrote: >> On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:03:56 -0400, Tim Slattery <Slattery_T(a)bls.gov> >> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >> >>> This seems completely nuts to me. Am I missing a way around this, or >>> am I doomed to recompile and/or add searches on more and more variants >>> of the JNDI name? >> >> Hold your nose for this one. It smells of very old C++ code. >> >> Poke around in System.properties to see if you can find something that >> will tell you which womb you are using. Then write a method that does >> your JNDI given a magic string. > > We had a similar problem, and went with a solution similar to what Roedy > suggests - finding out which womb we are in. We had to port our > application to Websphere and Tomcat. For Tomcat, we instantiate > InitialContext by calling the zero argument constructor, while in > WebSphere we need to pass a Properties object with a key-value pair of > Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY==>"com.ibm.websphere.naming.WsnInitialContextFactory" Really? Did you try setting the javax.naming.factory.initial system property to that value at WebSphere startup, and then using the no-args constructor? tom -- Standing on the shoulders of Google
From: Abu Yahya on 22 Apr 2010 13:26 Tom Anderson wrote: > On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, Abu Yahya wrote: > >> Roedy Green wrote: >>> On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:03:56 -0400, Tim Slattery <Slattery_T(a)bls.gov> >>> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >>> >>>> This seems completely nuts to me. Am I missing a way around this, or >>>> am I doomed to recompile and/or add searches on more and more variants >>>> of the JNDI name? >>> >>> Hold your nose for this one. It smells of very old C++ code. >>> >>> Poke around in System.properties to see if you can find something >>> that will tell you which womb you are using. Then write a method >>> that does your JNDI given a magic string. >> >> We had a similar problem, and went with a solution similar to what >> Roedy suggests - finding out which womb we are in. We had to port our >> application to Websphere and Tomcat. For Tomcat, we instantiate >> InitialContext by calling the zero argument constructor, while in >> WebSphere we need to pass a Properties object with a key-value pair of >> Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY==>"com.ibm.websphere.naming.WsnInitialContextFactory" >> > > Really? Did you try setting the javax.naming.factory.initial system > property to that value at WebSphere startup, and then using the no-args > constructor? > I didn't know about that method previously - it certainly works :) But setting the property as a JVM arg does not break the code I posted above - that is, if you first test whether you're in Websphere rather than in Tomcat.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: get CPU info, RAM info Next: ordinal() returns inconsistent values? |