JSH: Prime gaps examples
in [Math]
|
Prev: Prime gaps examples
Next: FERMATISTS:: WHY IS "(10^2 +9^2)-1 X 2 = (10^2- 9^2)^2-1= 360=360" --- What is the page number in your book?
From: JSH Breakthrough Math Otter on 22 Jul 2010 10:40 Idiot.
From: Jesse F. Hughes on 22 Jul 2010 12:07 JSH <jstevh(a)gmail.com> writes: > On Jul 21, 9:37 pm, Tim Little <t...(a)little-possums.net> wrote: >> On 2010-07-22, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > One thing that often fascinates me about arguments about mathematics >> > is, when it occurs to me that a poster has no interest whatsoever in >> > what the correct mathematics actually is!!! >> >> Gee, how ironic. I noticed you snipped out the actually relevant >> mathematics to embark on your rant. Here it is again: >> >> When you count the primes less than K with residue 1 vs residue 2 >> mod 3, the 2s are in front for almost all values of K. Why is that >> if your claim of "no preference" was correct? > > Why can you have runs of 10 heads in a row when you flip a coin? > > What does that prove mathematically? Coin bias towards heads? I wonder if the phrase "for almost all values of K" means anything. -- What you want with a hen What you want with a woman Won't cackle when she lays? when she won't do nothin' I say? What you want with a hen -- Charlie Patton, Won't cackle when she lays? "Banty Rooster Blues"
From: Arte Atem on 22 Jul 2010 14:03 "JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:a58c491b-da0e-4bf1-a4a1-b9bbb925ee94(a)m35g2000prn.googlegroups.com... On Jul 21, 9:37 pm, Tim Little <t...(a)little-possums.net> wrote: >> On 2010-07-22, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > One thing that often fascinates me about arguments about mathematics >> > is, when it occurs to me that a poster has no interest whatsoever in >> > what the correct mathematics actually is!!! >> >> Gee, how ironic. I noticed you snipped out the actually relevant >> mathematics to embark on your rant. Here it is again: >> >> When you count the primes less than K with residue 1 vs residue 2 >> mod 3, the 2s are in front for almost all values of K. Why is that >> if your claim of "no preference" was correct? >Why can you have runs of 10 heads in a row when you flip a coin? why not? Mother nature is not excluding any types of sequences. >What does that prove mathematically? Coin bias towards heads? that flipping a coin is an independent trial. > What *in mathematical language* are you actually claiming? k^m = q mod N has multiple solutions because of use of mod function. >With no preference the primes behave probabilistically no they do not. probability is a human construct to understand numbers. a prime is just a number, it does not even know it is prime. is a prime in base 10 the same as a prime in base 3 ? >with regard to >residues modulo a lesser prime. That is the prime residue axiom. an axiom is a guess, and your "prime residue axiom" fails. >Search in ANY search engine: prime residue axiom sure found this; "JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:5141d1da-1266-4345-80ff-94fd799b76e8(a)y7g2000prc.googlegroups.com... > There is a lot of satisfaction with having my own axiom, which I had > the honor of naming as I'm the discoverer, which is of course, the > prime residue axiom, > > But who could actually find the prime > residue axiom? I did. > > > > I have my own axiom. > You know it took me over 3 1/2 years to even put it out as an axiom? How **cute** you found your own little baby axiom to take care of ! >Runs of any type of behavior are as boring as any supposed pattern in >a random sequence. your math gives everybody the runs. >James Harris
From: Rotwang on 22 Jul 2010 14:25 JSH wrote: > On Jul 21, 9:37 pm, Tim Little <t...(a)little-possums.net> wrote: >> On 2010-07-22, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> One thing that often fascinates me about arguments about mathematics >>> is, when it occurs to me that a poster has no interest whatsoever in >>> what the correct mathematics actually is!!! >> Gee, how ironic. I noticed you snipped out the actually relevant >> mathematics to embark on your rant. Here it is again: >> >> When you count the primes less than K with residue 1 vs residue 2 >> mod 3, the 2s are in front for almost all values of K. Why is that >> if your claim of "no preference" was correct? > > Why can you have runs of 10 heads in a row when you flip a coin? > > What does that prove mathematically? Coin bias towards heads? > >> What *in mathematical language* are you actually claiming? > > With no preference the primes behave probabilistically with regard to > residues modulo a lesser prime. That is the prime residue axiom. > > Search in ANY search engine: prime residue axiom > > Runs of any type of behavior are as boring as any supposed pattern in > a random sequence. http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2001-10-25/
From: Joshua Cranmer on 22 Jul 2010 17:34
On 07/21/2010 11:49 PM, JSH wrote: > <deleted> > > Yet 6 is NOT prime. Ironically enough, the part you deleted was the part where I explained why it is still significant. You state an assertion without any evidence to lead one to believe it; I have provided evidence and a discussion that admits reasonable doubt as to the validity of your assertion. -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth |