Prev: CERN, LHC. The End is soon.
Next: Does anyone know what "wardforce" is?
From: doug on 8 Nov 2009 12:22


JSH wrote:

> On Nov 8, 6:26 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote:
>
>>JSH wrote:
>>
>>>I've talked about Google searches that pull in my research highly, but
>>>I'm more interested now in the web searches that pull in a hate page
>>>against me on Crank.net, which is a website of Erik Max Francis, whom
>>>I encountered on the sci.math newsgroup years ago.
>>
>>>It elicited howls of glee on that newsgroup when he put the page up
>>>against me, and years later I'm beginning to see that the posters of
>>>that group were probably right and this one person has an amazingly
>>>powerful negative impact on you.
>>
>>He has a pretty accurate report on you.
>>
>>
>>>Today I have various ideas which I think are important across a lot of
>>>areas and I'm here to tell you: no progress.
>>
>>You think your ideas are important but they are mixtures of useless
>>and wrong.
>
>
> But what if that's not true?

So far it is true.
>
> Anyone who does a search on solving quadratic residues in Google or
> Yahoo! will get pages on my math blog highlighting research which
> increasingly appears to be ONE solution of 3 possible I have that may
> solve the factoring problem.

If you post something a million times, it shows up higher. That does
not mean it is correct.
>
> But if they do a search on my name, they will get a Crank.net page
> listing me as a crackpot.

You worked to get that listing. Remember the FLT "proof", etc?

>
> Search: solving quadratic residues
> Search: james harris
>
> Some posters claim I'm just getting search results I like! Well I
> don't like Erik Max Francis's page!!!

You try very carefully to get search results you like. But you
have to see the others. Google is not required to make you
happy..

>
> And also now I'm taking over Yahoo! with the result as well.
>
> It is a result that may solve the factoring problem!!! It is
> gaining!!!

There is nothing happening with it except that you are babbling
about it a lot.

>
> What if Erik Max Francis is wrong, but his page is helping to hide a
> solution to the factoring problem because the web amplifies negatives
> in a social transistor effect?

He is reporting facts.
>
> Then RSA public keys might be factored easily enough by someone who
> advances my research, while I am still stuck in arguments on Usenet.

You choose to come to usenet.

> Not because I'm wrong, but because the Internet magnifies negatives
> over positives.

You have shown no positives so it just reflects what you have shown.

>
> But how long can that last? I don't know. History has some really
> weird stories, so it could take a while.
>
> It is possible that security professionals faced with active exploits
> that mathematicians tell them are impossible given accepted
> mathematics will simply rationalize them and claim "human error".
>
> That can happen INDEFINITELY until enough exploits occur that the
> system collapses, as human denial can go on far beyond reason.

Read you lines above and see why no one takes you seriously and why
your listing on crank.net is very secure.

>
> So Erik Max Francis, and you, along with other hostile Usenet posters
> can be helping to end civilization as we know it, or with less
> hyperbole, crash the current Internet.

Yes, paranoia and ego. They both get in the way of you seeing reality.

>
> What may die when it's all said and done is the first version of the
> Internet.
>
> Which may go down in flames on a wave of massive human stupidity on a
> worldwide scale, but lead by people in the United States and the
> United Kingdom.
>
> And the United Kingdom may go bankrupt as a secondary impact.

Again, read what you have written carefully and you will see why
people are laughing at you. Don't you care?

>
>
> James Harris
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: CERN, LHC. The End is soon.
Next: Does anyone know what "wardforce" is?