JSH: Twin primes
in [Math]
|
From: David C. Ullrich on 4 Feb 2010 06:16 On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:10:25 -0800 (PST), Ludovicus <luiroto(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On 31 ene, 06:34, David C. Ullrich <ullr...(a)math.okstate.edu> wrote: > >> ,...because the primes are not actually random in any sense that >> would make those arguments into actual proofs. >> > >If the primes were random there are not possibility of actual proofs. >Ludovicus You should learn some math before making pronouncements like this. It's certainly possible to make actual proofs regarding "random" things. > >
From: master1729 on 3 Feb 2010 21:08 > On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:10:25 -0800 (PST), Ludovicus > <luiroto(a)yahoo.com> > wrote: > > >On 31 ene, 06:34, David C. Ullrich > <ullr...(a)math.okstate.edu> wrote: > > > >> ,...because the primes are not actually random in > any sense that > >> would make those arguments into actual proofs. > >> > > > >If the primes were random there are not possibility > of actual proofs. > >Ludovicus > > You should learn some math before making > pronouncements like this. > It's certainly possible to make actual proofs > regarding "random" > things. indeed. > > > > > >
From: master1729 on 3 Feb 2010 21:14 > On Feb 3, 7:46 am, James Burns <burns...(a)osu.edu> > wrote: > > William Hughes wrote: > > > On Feb 3, 12:21 am, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>Even as a mental exercise, one would think that > > >>some of you would be curious about how you > disprove > > >>Goldbach's Conjecture with something as simple > > >>as saying that primes have no residue preference. > > > > > Please, Please, tell us how you disprove > Goldbach's > > > Conjecture with something as simple as saying > > > that primes have no residue preference. > > > > Hah! That is just what the Mathematical Cabal would > > like, for James to make public his disproof of the > > Goldbach Conjecture. Then they can get to work > > suppressing it. > > It's been public. > > > (It stands to reason, of course, that the Cabal > > would be helpless to suppress something that has > > not been made public.) > > > > Jim Burns > > It's been public for years. > > I came up with the twin primes probability result > back in 2006, > continued with it to disproving Goldbach's > Conjecture, put all on my > math blog and moved on. > > Oh, back then I did web searches on the idea of > random with twin > primes and some things came up, so it's not my idea > first. > > Seems some mathematicians came up with it years ago. > > Fascinating, eh? > > My analysis indicates that some in math society may > believe their > dominance is near completion, but their takeover of > physics is still > problematic, so some of them may have been sabotaging > the Large Hadron > Collider. In one case claiming it was birds, of all > things. > > I'm doing an endrun around them. > > One step is protecting the LHC from further sabotage. > Later this > month it will begin running again, and soon it may be > possible to > begin tearing down the system that has been built up > so carefully to > produce false info to hold on to bogus theories. > > These things are more interesting done suddenly. > > Years of preparation to destroy careers in days. > > Governments have to be involved. A lot of these > issues are national > security issues anyway. > > Your ignorance of what your government may or may not > know is not a > protection for you. > > Have a nice day. Go fill out a funding proposal or > something. > > > James Harris > Great james harris , plz grant us your infinite wisdom and show us plain mortals the smallest counterexample to Goldbach :) lol tommy1729
From: master1729 on 3 Feb 2010 21:17 Brenneman wrote : (snip) > You've become the poster boy for the saying that > insanity is doing the > same thing over and over and expecting a different > result. > > M > isnt that how they search for the higgs boson ? hahaha LMAO. :) tommy1729
From: Jesse F. Hughes on 4 Feb 2010 07:45
JSH <jstevh(a)gmail.com> writes: > My analysis indicates that some in math society may believe their > dominance is near completion, but their takeover of physics is still > problematic, so some of them may have been sabotaging the Large Hadron > Collider. In one case claiming it was birds, of all things. Whoa. Mathematicians have almost taken over the world? And they're sabotaging the LHC? This stuff is fantastic! It's Tom Clancy for Illuminated Geeks! -- Jesse F. Hughes "This post marks the end of an era in the world of mathematics." -- James S. Harris and the demise of Galois theory |