Prev: can we use the geometry template of finite-line vs. infinite-line to precision define finite-number vs. infinite-number? #626 Correcting Math
Next: Simple question about fourier representation
From: José Carlos Santos on 3 Jul 2010 03:07 On 03-07-2010 1:47, Nando wrote: > I have parametrized an ellipse in order to calculate its area by an > integral. In the end I will explain the whole problem (this is a sort > of homework assignment). > > The ellipse is defined in R^3, z= 0; and x^2 /20 + y^2 /30 = 1 Since you are working with an ellipse located at the plane z = 0, why don't you just work in R^2? > my parametric function is: > (let "p" stand for ro, and "o" for theta) > > g: ] 0, 1 [ x ] 0, 2 pi[ -> R^3 > > g ( p, o) = sqr(20) p cos o, sqr (30) p sen o, 0 ) (the last one is a > zero) > > so I have a double integral > > int from 0 to 1 and int from 0 to 2 pi > > Then, I need to put the Jacobian determinant in there. > > I find the derivative of my parametrization function: > > sqr(20) cos o -sqr(20 p sen o > sqr(30) sen o sqr(30) cos o > 0 0 > > Since I have no idea how to find the determinant of this matrice I That's natural; the determinant is defined only for square matrices. > > simple ignored the zeros and (amazingly) got the same answer as the > teacher solutions: -20 sqr(6) pi (there is a -2 outside the double > integral from previous calculations). That is not amazing; your teacher worked in R^2 and therefore got a 2 x 2 matrix, which is equal to the matrix formed by the first two lines of yours. > But, if there were some different values there, instead of zero, I do > not know how I could find the Jacobian determinant! > > Anyone wants to offer some advice? > (another tricky situation is when I parametrize a simple curve in R^3, > and get a column matrix as derivative (gradiant). How do I find a > determinant then?!) Again, the determinant is defined only for square matrices. Best regards, Jose Carlos Santos |