JavaScript code mangler / scrambler / ... khm, more than obfuscator... :)
in [JavaScript]
|
Prev: Code Guidelines
Next: JavaScript code mangler / scrambler / ... khm, more than obfuscator... :)
From: Jorge on 6 Jan 2010 07:57 On Jan 6, 1:46 pm, Andrew <anz...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The thread has given a pretty strong consensus that those goals > > > (...) are not worth pursuing. > > +1. :) -1. :-) -- Jorge.
From: Andrew on 6 Jan 2010 08:18 On Jan 5, 5:21 pm, "Ira Baxter" <idbax...(a)semdesigns.com> wrote: > You should read the following paper on how to make extremely > difficult obfuscation: > > http://math.auckland.ac.nz/bitstream/2292/4398/1/0674154.pdf The link doesn't work and it seems their webpage has some difficulties (results on Google all point to another, nonexisting server - I guess they are doing the redirect poorly), while their own search finds nothing on 'obfuscation'. Any chance you could provide a better link or path to the file? Thanks!
From: Andrew on 6 Jan 2010 08:25 On Jan 6, 2:18 pm, Andrew <anz...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 5, 5:21 pm, "Ira Baxter" <idbax...(a)semdesigns.com> wrote: > > > You should read the following paper on how to make extremely > > difficult obfuscation: > > >http://math.auckland.ac.nz/bitstream/2292/4398/1/0674154.pdf > > Any chance you could provide a better link or path to the file? Nevermind, I think i found it: Design and Evaluation of Slicing Obfuscations Stephen Drape and Anirban Majumdar http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/CDMTCS/researchreports/311stephen.pdf Looks like an interesting read, thank you! (if you had something else in mind, please repost the link)
From: Scott Sauyet on 6 Jan 2010 09:16 On Jan 6, 7:57 am, Jorge <jo...(a)jorgechamorro.com> wrote: >>>> The thread has given a pretty strong consensus that those goals >>>> (...) are not worth pursuing. > > -1. :-) I'm curious as to why. Do you see a compelling case for trying to obfuscate Javascript source, even to the likely detriment of its performance? This thread turned into a discussion of possible means and of theoretical obstacles, but outside your initial brief comment, I've seen little from you or anyone else to suggest that this really is worth actually trying. Do you still think it is? If so, why? -- Scott
From: Jorge on 6 Jan 2010 11:02
Ba Wna 1, 8:61 cz, Fpbgg Fnhlrg <fpbgg.fnh...(a)tznvy.pbz> jebgr: > > ... V'ir > frra yvggyr sebz lbh be nalbar ryfr gb fhttrfg gung guvf ernyyl vf > jbegu npghnyyl gelvat. Qb lbh fgvyy guvax vg vf? Lrf. > Vs fb, jul? Gb znxr yrff boivbhf gur qrgnvyf bs lbhe pbqr. -- Wbetr. |