From: Robert Baer on
John Fields wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:02:03 -0500, John Fields
> <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10 Jun 2010 13:23:55 -0700, Winfield Hill
>> <Winfield_member(a)newsguy.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> In a ringing bell application, as the supply voltage sags,
>>> and the amplitude drops, I imagine the circuit will move
>>> from class C back to class A operation, before stopping.
>> ---
>> Why imagine?
>>
>> Here's a circuit list that'll show it all _and_ it'll create a .wav
>> file, "bong.wav" in whatever folder the cicuit's in, so you can hear
>> it.
>>
>> Enjoy! :-)
>
> ---
> Oops...
> Here it is:
>
> Version 4
> SHEET 1 936 680
> WIRE -384 48 -592 48
> WIRE -320 48 -384 48
> WIRE -112 48 -224 48
> WIRE 16 48 -112 48
> WIRE 112 48 16 48
> WIRE 16 64 16 48
> WIRE 112 64 112 48
> WIRE -384 96 -384 48
> WIRE -112 96 -112 48
> WIRE -448 144 -496 144
> WIRE 16 160 16 128
> WIRE 112 160 112 144
> WIRE 112 160 16 160
> WIRE -496 176 -496 144
> WIRE -592 192 -592 48
> WIRE -272 192 -272 112
> WIRE -272 192 -384 192
> WIRE 16 192 16 160
> WIRE -112 240 -112 176
> WIRE -48 240 -112 240
> WIRE -384 272 -384 192
> WIRE -272 272 -272 192
> WIRE -496 288 -496 256
> WIRE -112 304 -112 240
> WIRE 16 320 16 288
> WIRE 112 320 16 320
> WIRE 16 336 16 320
> WIRE 112 336 112 320
> WIRE -592 432 -592 272
> WIRE -496 432 -496 368
> WIRE -496 432 -592 432
> WIRE -384 432 -384 352
> WIRE -384 432 -496 432
> WIRE -272 432 -272 336
> WIRE -272 432 -384 432
> WIRE -112 432 -112 368
> WIRE -112 432 -272 432
> WIRE 16 432 16 416
> WIRE 16 432 -112 432
> WIRE 112 432 112 416
> WIRE 112 432 16 432
> WIRE -592 528 -592 432
> FLAG -592 528 0
> SYMBOL ind2 96 48 R0
> SYMATTR InstName L1
> SYMATTR Value 20e-3
> SYMATTR Type ind
> SYMBOL ind2 96 432 M180
> WINDOW 0 36 80 Left 0
> WINDOW 3 36 40 Left 0
> SYMATTR InstName L2
> SYMATTR Value 500e-6
> SYMATTR Type ind
> SYMATTR SpiceLine Rser=.01
> SYMBOL npn -48 192 R0
> SYMATTR InstName Q1
> SYMATTR Value 2N3904
> SYMBOL res -128 80 R0
> SYMATTR InstName R1
> SYMATTR Value 100k
> SYMBOL cap 0 64 R0
> SYMATTR InstName C1
> SYMATTR Value 10e-6
> SYMBOL voltage -592 176 R0
> WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
> WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0
> WINDOW 3 24 104 Invisible 0
> SYMATTR Value 5
> SYMATTR InstName V2
> SYMBOL pnp -448 192 M180
> SYMATTR InstName Q3
> SYMATTR Value 2N4403
> SYMBOL voltage -496 272 R0
> WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
> WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0
> WINDOW 3 24 104 Invisible 0
> SYMATTR Value PULSE(5 0 0 1e-6 1e-6 .01)
> SYMATTR InstName V1
> SYMBOL npn -320 112 R270
> SYMATTR InstName Q2
> SYMATTR Value 2N3904
> SYMBOL cap -288 272 R0
> SYMATTR InstName C4
> SYMATTR Value 1e-6
> SYMBOL res -400 256 R0
> SYMATTR InstName R2
> SYMATTR Value 100k
> SYMBOL res -512 160 R0
> SYMATTR InstName R3
> SYMATTR Value 1000
> SYMBOL cap -128 304 R0
> SYMATTR InstName C2
> SYMATTR Value 1e-7
> SYMBOL res 0 320 R0
> SYMATTR InstName R4
> SYMATTR Value 750
> TEXT 32 184 Left 0 !K1 L1 L2 1
> TEXT -528 464 Left 0 !.tran 5
> TEXT -528 496 Left 0 !.wave .\\bong.wav 8 10000 N008
>
THANKS!
From: John Larkin on
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:49:47 -0700, BlindBaby
<BlindMelonChitlin(a)wellnevergetthatonethealbumcover.org> wrote:

>On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:14:34 -0700, John Larkin
><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:09:29 -0700, BlindBaby
>><BlindMelonChitlin(a)wellnevergetthatonethealbumcover.org> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:37:43 -0700, John Larkin
>>><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:15:50 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
>>>><jeroen(a)nospam.please> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>John Larkin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I like the way it works with a very high turns ratio, very small AC
>>>>>> drive at the emitter. But at lower ratios, it gets very nonlinear and
>>>>>> becomes, if that means anything, a tuned blocking oscillator. The base
>>>>>> capacitor value would be lowered so that the cap recharges a bunch
>>>>>> during a oscillatory cycle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm sure JT and JF will spend the next week diligently searching for a
>>>>>> set of values that will make my circuit not work. Then they'll crow,
>>>>>> or rather, cluck about it. That's OK: as Woody Allen says, we need the
>>>>>> eggs.
>>>>>
>>>>>I made it squeg. Maybe that will please them.
>>>>>
>>>>>Jeroen Belleman
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Sloman is our resident squegging expert.
>>>>
>>>>John
>>>
>>>
>>> We should take a poll as to what attribute you are an expert in.
>>>
>>> I don't think it would result in the same determination that you
>>>obviously think it would.
>>
>>Do you know what squegging means? Tell us.
>
> I have characterized a lot of oscillator circuits at the bench, John.
>Remember... power supplies... That was years ago. Now it is what the
>power supplies power. Still lots of oscillators though.
>
>>
>>There are maybe two usages, both electronic,
>
> I have very little faith in your word derivative/origin declarations,
>John. That is aside from the fact that I am familiar with the word.
>Remember? I work in this industry.
>
>> but one of them is
>>obscure,
>
> Perhaps only in your thinking.
>
>> and the other is even more obscure.
>
> Certainly only in your thinking.

Lotta munbling. What does it mean? What causes it?

John



From: John Larkin on
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:37:09 -0300, YD <ydtechHAT(a)techie.com> wrote:

>Late at night, by candle light, Jeroen Belleman <jeroen(a)nospam.please>
>penned this immortal opus:
>
>>John Larkin wrote:
>>>
>>> I like the way it works with a very high turns ratio, very small AC
>>> drive at the emitter. But at lower ratios, it gets very nonlinear and
>>> becomes, if that means anything, a tuned blocking oscillator. The base
>>> capacitor value would be lowered so that the cap recharges a bunch
>>> during a oscillatory cycle.
>>>
>>> I'm sure JT and JF will spend the next week diligently searching for a
>>> set of values that will make my circuit not work. Then they'll crow,
>>> or rather, cluck about it. That's OK: as Woody Allen says, we need the
>>> eggs.
>>
>>I made it squeg. Maybe that will please them.
>>
>
>Yes, the tank's Q must be kept high. Increasing La's series R makes it
>squegg in a rather amusing way. Might be fun capturing it to a .wav.

I always ran it with a big base capacitor. I'd expect that to prevent
squegging, as the tank resonance/rectification thing should be 1st
order, and 1st order loops are stable. A smaller base cap adds a
second time-variant element in the right ballpark.

>
>JL: Can you recall ballpark the values of the inductors and associated
>frequencies in the physical circuit? High valued Ls tend to be rather
>resistive unless they're grossly oversized.

Sorry, can't remember values after 35 years.

John

From: John Larkin on
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:56:27 -0500, John Fields
<jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:47:19 -0700, John Larkin
><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:02:44 -0500, "Tim Williams"
>><tmoranwms(a)charter.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"Jim Thompson" <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote in
>>>message news:1q3316tr0ak2u8rdhr974agci3svmobtjo(a)4ax.com...
>>>> Isn't there some young buck out there who can analyze circuits ?:-(
>>>
>>>Me?
>>>
>>>Go do it yourself Jim.
>>>
>>>Tim
>>
>>I like the way it works with a very high turns ratio, very small AC
>>drive at the emitter. But at lower ratios, it gets very nonlinear and
>>becomes, if that means anything, a tuned blocking oscillator. The base
>>capacitor value would be lowered so that the cap recharges a bunch
>>during a oscillatory cycle.
>>
>>I'm sure JT and JF will spend the next week diligently searching for a
>>set of values that will make my circuit not work.
>
>---
>What a lying, insolent wretch you are.
>
>You don't even have the good grace to place component values on the
>sketch and here, after I've gone to all the trouble of prettying it up
>so it'll run at an audible frequency, simulating it, and even getting
>a .wav file so the gong sound can be heard, you have nothing but lies,
>insults, and, of course, no acknowledgement of the work and time spent
>on your behalf.

What's your hourly rate? Send me a bill.

John

From: John Larkin on
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:50:15 -0700, Robert Baer
<robertbaer(a)localnet.com> wrote:

>..and if the drive parameters can be tweaked for minimum losses like
>that, byt still have sufficient gain to start oscillations, then the
>linearity and purity would then be maximized.

:-)

John

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Prev: Twin T circuit wanted
Next: And blocking oscillators