Just a dimension analysis of photon momentum!!
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: God, the ant, & Space_Time
Next: FLUSHING THE TOILET
From: Y.Porat on 26 Jun 2010 14:55 On Jun 26, 4:50 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 26, 9:45 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > ---------------------i > > ddint mean just the M K S or else basic dimension analysis > > AND I EXPLAINED IT CLEARLY!! > > > THE M K S (OR ANOTHER DIMESION STYSTEM > > IS ONLY THE SKELETON OF THE FORMULA!! > > And it is only the skeleton of the formula -- the dimensions -- that > dimensional analysis deals with! That's what it's for! > That's why I keep telling you that you're trying to do too much with > dimensional analysis -- more than what dimensional analysis is > designed to provide. > This is because you do not understand what dimensional analysis is > FOR, or HOW TO DO IT, or WHAT YOU LEARN when you do it properly. > Therefore, whenever you say you're going to do dimensional analysis of > anything, your readers know right away that what you're about to write > is going to be nonsense. > > > > > THE SKELETON OF A FORMULA > > IS GOOD AS A SKELETON OF A DEAD MAN !!! > > i was meaning a muchdealer analysis!! > > probably not written in any book > > (unless you wil yel the popel that it was done > > already 80 years ago !! (:-) (remember ) (:-) > > > we need may be for the first time ?? > > > AN ANALYSIS OF THE SKELETON PLUS FLESH > > of that momentum formula > > TO MAKE THAT FORMULA ALIVE > > by > > REAL AND DEEPER AND MORE CORRECT UNDERSTANDING OF IT !! > > without false interpretations of it !! > > it seems that you dont understand what is on stake !! > > on stake is a revolution in some of modern physics paradigms !!! > > it s does nt matter with any system we do it > > the M K S system is good enough > > but while examing (examining !! > > you call it any namwe of examination > > i dont mind its name!! > > anyway > > it is not only a '''post mortem"" examination of just a skeleton of > > the formula !!! > > it is an examination of > > ALL OF IT TO THE LAST DETAIL AVAILABLE TO US !! > > > sine here was a claim that soemthingin it is relativistic > > we have tolook intop it if that has some solid base > > > ( in case you dont remember i am a poor bridge Engineer > > and as such i am always looking for solid bases > > not just hand savings !!) > > so > > i did that simple basic (probably unprecedented though very simple) > > andi asked myself > > wahtthe hell is relativistic in that 'decomposed ' formula?? > > > nothing in the m K S basic dimensions > > (there is no > > M! K1 K2 K3 S system > > there is M K S sysem > > unless you are comitted toinvent a new dimension system > > and BTW > > if you say tha there is an > > M K1 K2 K3 S systyem then > > which of them K is relativistic > > K1 K2 or K3 ??? > > or may it is the Meter that is relativistic?? > > or may be the BASIC Second is relativistic > > if not we goon examining > > may be > > 6.6 exp-34 is relativistic?? > > may be > > fs (the figure associated the freqaunxcy ?? > > even thatnot > > or may be > > in that 30000000 figure (of c ) > > so > > > where do you see anything relativistic in that formula ?? > > > i expect an honest serious RESPONSIBLE answer !! > > > TIA > > Y.Porat > > ------------------------- (:-) the crook PD decided to gamble on all the cash!! why do tell me i am wrong piggy JUST SHOW US HOW DO **YOU DO IT BETTER!! an honest reasonable man would do it that way ie you say something is wrong than he would show how to doit ''''the right way''' !!!!!! DONT HAND WAVE PIGGY CROOK !! JUST SHOW US*** YOUR* ANALYSIS !!! probably you are unable top do do even that !!! it is not written in your books idiot parrot crook!! 2 IT IS QUITE SURE THAT YOUR PUBLISHING PRIVATE BUSINESS GOT TO DO WITH IT !!! SOON WE ARE GOING TO SEE PD S PUBLICATIONS OR OF HIS FRIENDS THAT WILL BE SURPRISINGLY SIMILAR TO MY FINDINGS !! 2 CROOKY WHAT DID YOU DO WITH THE BOOK YOU STOLE FROM, ME ?? ARE WE GOING TO SEE IT as well ONE DAY AS **YOUR PUBLICATION ** ???!!! OR OF YOUR FRIENDS THIEF'S ??? he shameless pig thief deludes himself that he can cheat all the world forever !!! BYE new Josef !!! we will go ahead without you and your other fake ANONYMOUS names Inertial =artful = whoever etc !!! all the gangsters pigs of your publishing business !!! Y.P -------------------------- |