From: Eliyas Yakub [MSFT] on 24 Sep 2006 12:47 http://blogs.msdn.com/doronh/archive/2006/09/15/756883.aspx -Eliyas
From: Kevin on 25 Sep 2006 17:39 "anton bassov" <soviet_bloke(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1159062696.074121.228890(a)b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > Maxim, > > > > In fact, you can, but it does not necessarily mean that you should..... > > > > Yes, you can use the hammer for screws and the screwdriver for nails, but for > > what? > > > The problem is that, when you say "you cannot do it" and the OP knows > that he *CAN*, > it automatically invalidates your advice in his eyes - If the OP automatically invalidates the advice of one of the best contributors in the group, based on a single remark, then that person is not looking for advice, they are looking for someone to agree with their pre-determined solution (which, if it is in conflict to this best advice, is a-priori incorrect). The contributors to this newsgroup have a great responsibility to the customer-at-large to give the best possible advice, so that the user-experience is not diminished by drivers that introduce instability into their systems. No one in this group (contributors, questioners and lurkers) benefits from the ill effects that drivers using questionable means or undocumented features inevitably produce. There are plenty of sources for that kind of input. This newsgroup is not one of them. The advice given in this newsgroup can and will be used by OP's to take to their bosses as a justification for adopting a proposed solution. There is no better way for someone to justify a certain approach to solving a problem than if it receives an OK from Maxim, or Don, or Slava, or Tim, or Eliyas, or Pavel, or Thomas, and others (apologies to all you contributing experts not mentioned -- your efforts are deeply appreciated by us casual-inquirers and ever-present lurkers). Twice, when proposing solutions to certain problems, I was asked to run it by the experts in this newsgroup. Only when it received no negatives was I allowed to proceed. > after all, you > don't explain things to him simply by saying NO, do you??? In addition to saying "NO", Maxim always gives the correct advice, as do all the other expert contributors. There should be a Hall Of Fame for these guys. > However, > when you tell him "actually, you can, but doing things this way is just > unreasonable - it is like using hammer for screws", it gives him a > second thought...... .... which is just a distraction from the goal of solving the problem in such a way that preserves the integrity of customer systems. Working programmers and their managers appreciate it when the focus is kept on proposing real solutions.
From: Maxim S. Shatskih on 27 Sep 2006 17:05 > The problem is that, when you say "you cannot do it" and the OP knows > that he *CAN*, I will also say that you cannot use hammer for screws. Use the screwdriver instead. > it automatically invalidates your advice in his eyes Promoting the good development practices is what I'm considering an obligation of the MVP. -- Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP StorageCraft Corporation maxim(a)storagecraft.com http://www.storagecraft.com
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Windows 2003 Performance vs. Windows 2000 Next: SHELL32!_SHCreateProcess |