From: Lew on
Zlatko Duric wrote:
> On 04/26/2010 12:40 PM, Lew wrote:
>
>> Zlatko Duric wrote:
>>> Can you elaborate a bit that one? Why is that, what's the trick?
>>
>> Why: because keyboards already have too much for the right hand to do.
>> Putting the mouse on the left balances the load better.
>>
>> What's the trick: I don't understand the question.
>>
>
> What's the trick was just a repeated question number one, to elaborate.
> I wanted to know why is it better to point and click with my left hand
> (which I'm doing now, btw :) )
>
> Thanks anyway

Why do you say "anyway"?

--
Lew
From: Arne Vajhøj on
On 26-04-2010 09:01, Lew wrote:
> Tom Anderson wrote:
>> I don't use the numpad much, but i [sic] do use the keys in between the numpad
>> and the main block, and without a numpad, you don't get a proper version
>> of those. But yes, good point about the numpad not being that useful.
>
> Actually, it's a really, really terrible point since the numpad is
> very useful.

I suspect that the usefulness or non-usefulness depends a lot
on the person using the keyboard.

Arne
From: Arne Vajhøj on
On 24-04-2010 12:39, jebblue wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:13:44 +0100, Break Point wrote:
>> Beautiful dreams of the ridiculously expensive Optimus Maximus.
>
> It only supports Windows and Mac, that makes it useless.

For those 1-2% not using Windows or MacOS X.

Arne

From: Zlatko Duric on
On 04/26/2010 11:55 PM, Lew wrote:

>> What's the trick was just a repeated question number one, to
>> elaborate. I wanted to know why is it better to point and click with
>> my left hand (which I'm doing now, btw :) )
>>
>> Thanks anyway
>
> Why do you say "anyway"?

I didn't say "anyway". I just wrote it. Thanking you for the
explanation. The word "anyway" just got in there, without real need or
sense or meaning, as is this post.

--
Zlatko
From: Lew on
Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 26-04-2010 09:01, Lew wrote:
>> Tom Anderson wrote:
>>> I don't use the numpad much, but i [sic] do use the keys in between
>>> the numpad
>>> and the main block, and without a numpad, you don't get a proper version
>>> of those. But yes, good point about the numpad not being that useful.
>>
>> Actually, it's a really, really terrible point since the numpad is
>> very useful.
>
> I suspect that the usefulness or non-usefulness depends a lot
> on the person using the keyboard.

My point exactly, as explained upthread.

--
Lew