Known physics defeated by simple puzzle?
in [Physics]
|
From: Peter Webb on 3 Apr 2010 00:05 "Sue..." <suzysewnshow(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message news:eb6af071-e07b-4771-8722-d5f20fc9a0ac(a)15g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... On Apr 2, 11:30 pm, "Peter Webb" > Again, that must have been somebody else. If you think it was me, you > should > dig up the quote from me. I am happy to defend what *I* say in this > newsgroup, but I cannot be held responsible for things I didn't say. We will entertain the possibly that someone else is smart enough to know the difference in moving a grocer and moving mile-markers on the road to the grocer but the difference escapes you. That is consistent with your misrepresentation of Einstein's relativity. ____________________________________ Huh? Where did I misrepresent "Einstein's relativity"? Perhaps when you dig up the quotes where I talk about grocery shops, support Lorentz over SR, move mile-markers etc you can add in the quote from me where I misrepresent SR ? I note that you have still not provided one single quote from me which says any of these things you claim I said. The reason is that I never said any of them; you are simply making them up. Why do you need to lie?
From: Sue... on 3 Apr 2010 00:21 On Apr 3, 12:05 am, "Peter Webb" <webbfam...(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote: > "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message > > news:eb6af071-e07b-4771-8722-d5f20fc9a0ac(a)15g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 2, 11:30 pm, "Peter Webb" > > > Again, that must have been somebody else. If you think it was me, you > > should > > dig up the quote from me. I am happy to defend what *I* say in this > > newsgroup, but I cannot be held responsible for things I didn't say. > > We will entertain the possibly that someone else > is smart enough to know the difference in > moving a grocer and moving mile-markers > on the road to the grocer but the difference > escapes you. That is consistent with your > misrepresentation of Einstein's relativity. > > ____________________________________ > Huh? Where did I misrepresent "Einstein's relativity"? Where did you say: "All inertial frames are totally equivalent for the performance of all physical experiments" Sue... > > Perhaps when you dig up the quotes where I talk about grocery shops, support > Lorentz over SR, move mile-markers etc you can add in the quote from me > where I misrepresent SR ? > > I note that you have still not provided one single quote from me which says > any of these things you claim I said. > > The reason is that I never said any of them; you are simply making them up. > > Why do you need to lie?
From: Peter Webb on 3 Apr 2010 00:31 "Sue..." <suzysewnshow(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message news:e9522292-a675-45e8-86d7-441848765ed4(a)y14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... On Apr 3, 12:05 am, "Peter Webb" <webbfam...(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote: > "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message > > news:eb6af071-e07b-4771-8722-d5f20fc9a0ac(a)15g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 2, 11:30 pm, "Peter Webb" > > > Again, that must have been somebody else. If you think it was me, you > > should > > dig up the quote from me. I am happy to defend what *I* say in this > > newsgroup, but I cannot be held responsible for things I didn't say. > > We will entertain the possibly that someone else > is smart enough to know the difference in > moving a grocer and moving mile-markers > on the road to the grocer but the difference > escapes you. That is consistent with your > misrepresentation of Einstein's relativity. > > ____________________________________ > Huh? Where did I misrepresent "Einstein's relativity"? Where did you say: "All inertial frames are totally equivalent for the performance of all physical experiments" Sue... ________________________________ I didn't. You said that. And its not misrepresenting SR anyway, in fact its a direct quote from a University of Texas physics website which explains SR. Perhaps you should complain to the University of Texas that you think their physics department is misrepresenting SR? Or, even better, actually produce something that *I* said (not *you* said, and not what the University of Texas says) which misrepresents SR? Along with where I supposedly talked about grocery shops, mile-markers, contradicted SR, or argued Lorentz over SR, all of which you claimed I did, and none of which I did do. Again, I ask, why do you need to lie?
From: Sue... on 3 Apr 2010 00:40 On Apr 3, 12:31 am, "Peter Webb" <webbfam...(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote: > "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message > > news:e9522292-a675-45e8-86d7-441848765ed4(a)y14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 3, 12:05 am, "Peter Webb" > > > > <webbfam...(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote: > > "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message > > >news:eb6af071-e07b-4771-8722-d5f20fc9a0ac(a)15g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... > > On Apr 2, 11:30 pm, "Peter Webb" > > > > Again, that must have been somebody else. If you think it was me, you > > > should > > > dig up the quote from me. I am happy to defend what *I* say in this > > > newsgroup, but I cannot be held responsible for things I didn't say. > > > We will entertain the possibly that someone else > > is smart enough to know the difference in > > moving a grocer and moving mile-markers > > on the road to the grocer but the difference > > escapes you. That is consistent with your > > misrepresentation of Einstein's relativity. > > > ____________________________________ > > Huh? Where did I misrepresent "Einstein's relativity"? > > Where did you say: > > "All inertial frames are totally equivalent > for the performance of all physical experiments" > > Sue... > > ________________________________ > I didn't. Thank you. Where did you say the speed of light is independent of the motion of the emitter and absorber? Sue...
From: Peter Webb on 3 Apr 2010 00:45
"Sue..." <suzysewnshow(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message news:8af8a843-617b-4a4c-943d-096b712a9626(a)n34g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... On Apr 3, 12:31 am, "Peter Webb" <webbfam...(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote: > "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message > > news:e9522292-a675-45e8-86d7-441848765ed4(a)y14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 3, 12:05 am, "Peter Webb" > > > > <webbfam...(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote: > > "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message > > >news:eb6af071-e07b-4771-8722-d5f20fc9a0ac(a)15g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... > > On Apr 2, 11:30 pm, "Peter Webb" > > > > Again, that must have been somebody else. If you think it was me, you > > > should > > > dig up the quote from me. I am happy to defend what *I* say in this > > > newsgroup, but I cannot be held responsible for things I didn't say. > > > We will entertain the possibly that someone else > > is smart enough to know the difference in > > moving a grocer and moving mile-markers > > on the road to the grocer but the difference > > escapes you. That is consistent with your > > misrepresentation of Einstein's relativity. > > > ____________________________________ > > Huh? Where did I misrepresent "Einstein's relativity"? > > Where did you say: > > "All inertial frames are totally equivalent > for the performance of all physical experiments" > > Sue... > > ________________________________ > I didn't. Thank you. ______________________________ Your welcome. Where did you say the speed of light is independent of the motion of the emitter and absorber? __________________________________ I'm not sure I did, at least not that in that form. Are you actually going to post where I misrepresented SR, argued in favour of Lorentz over SR, talked about grocery shops, or talked about moving mile-markers? |