From: John Larkin on
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 09:49:44 -0700, "Joel Kolstad"
<JKolstad71HatesSpam(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
>news:n9cbg3h2ie7enqpurmsg350lr3ata4nsjl(a)4ax.com...
>> Does LTspice have a potentiometer component?
>
>Nope! From hearing Mike Engelhardt (the author) answer the question, I'm
>pretty sure it's that way on purpose -- he really does prefer two resistors,
>with one set to, e.g., {10k*x} and the other set to {10k*(1-x)}. (And then
>you use a .param statement to have LTspice step through the various values of
>x you're interested in.)
>
>I'm told that someone has posted (presumably on the Yahoo! group) a
>potentiometer just bundling up the two resistors into a single package (as
>Jim's .pdf demonstrates) in case you want something that looks "nicer."
>
>It's interesting that Mike seems to feel so strongly about pots one way
>whereas John Warner of SIMetrix fame seems to like pots so much he added the
>ability to use the cursor keys to "turn" the pot and automatically re-run
>simulation each time!
>

I don't suppose that Linear Tech puts many pots on their chips.

I'm still toying with a way to delay a signal 0 to 5 ns with one turn
of a pot, without wrecking the bandwidth and eye diagram. Maybe it
can't be reasonably done.

John

From: John Popelish on
John Larkin wrote:

> I'm still toying with a way to delay a signal 0 to 5 ns with one turn
> of a pot, without wrecking the bandwidth and eye diagram. Maybe it
> can't be reasonably done.

Does the pot adjust the clock frequency of a delay line?
From: John Larkin on
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:56:38 -0400, John Popelish <jpopelish(a)rica.net>
wrote:

>John Larkin wrote:
>
>> I'm still toying with a way to delay a signal 0 to 5 ns with one turn
>> of a pot, without wrecking the bandwidth and eye diagram. Maybe it
>> can't be reasonably done.
>
>Does the pot adjust the clock frequency of a delay line?

No, that would be easy, but we want picosecond jitter and at least,
say, 50 ps settability.

I have seen LC delay lines that used varicaps instead of fixed caps,
but that's really nasty. Base delay is big, delta-delay is small,
impedance changes with delay, and tc's are rotten. The HP 8133A pulse
generator does that, and it's a design worh studying, for its
performance and sheer monstrosity.

John




From: Helmut Sennewald on
"Joel Kolstad" <JKolstad71HatesSpam(a)yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:13gcqp98lamgo9a(a)corp.supernews.com...
> "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in
> message news:n9cbg3h2ie7enqpurmsg350lr3ata4nsjl(a)4ax.com...
>> Does LTspice have a potentiometer component?
>
> Nope! From hearing Mike Engelhardt (the author) answer the question, I'm
> pretty sure it's that way on purpose -- he really does prefer two
> resistors, with one set to, e.g., {10k*x} and the other set to
> {10k*(1-x)}. (And then you use a .param statement to have LTspice step
> through the various values of x you're interested in.)
>
> I'm told that someone has posted (presumably on the Yahoo! group) a
> potentiometer just bundling up the two resistors into a single package (as
> Jim's .pdf demonstrates) in case you want something that looks "nicer."


Hello,

I have posted a few months ago a second type of pot
into the Files section of the Yahoo group.
The first pot has been controlled with a parameter
while the latest example has a voltage controlled input.

Membership is free!
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/LTspice/
Files > Lib > Potentiometer
Best regards,
Helmut


> It's interesting that Mike seems to feel so strongly about pots one way
> whereas John Warner of SIMetrix fame seems to like pots so much he added
> the ability to use the cursor keys to "turn" the pot and automatically
> re-run simulation each time!
>
> ---Joel



From: YD on
Late at night, by candle light, John Larkin
<jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> penned this immortal
opus:

>Does LTspice have a potentiometer component? I'd like to do transient
>analysis sweeps, as a function of pot rotation.
>
>I can't find this. Any other way to simulate the function? I really
>need the varying resistances, so I can't just use a multiplier.
>
>
>John

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/LTspice/files/%20Lib/Potentiometer/

- YD.
--
Remove HAT if replying by mail.